Sun Rui-Xin, Xu Li, Liang Rong-Chang, Cai Qi-Jia, Ma Qian-Li, Geng Zheng-Yan, Lin Xing-Zhou, Yang Yu-Yin, Yao Ling-Ai, Zhao Rui
School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang 110168, China.
South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510535, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Oct 8;45(10):5822-5832. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202311178.
To explore the characteristics of phytoplankton communities and their relationship with environmental factors in different habitats of Hedi Reservoir, the inflow rivers, estuaries, and reservoir area of Hedi Reservoir were investigated in February (recession period), April (flood period), July (flood period), and December (recession period) of 2022. During the investigation, 231 species of phytoplankton that belong to seven phyla were identified, and the cell density of phytoplankton ranged from 2.94 × 10 - 8.04 × 10 cells·L. Phytoplankton cell density in flood periods were higher than that in recession periods, and that was higher in estuaries and the reservoir area than that in inflow rivers. Meanwhile, the cell density of phytoplankton in the estuarine and reservoir area was dominated by Cyanobacteria throughout the year, especially , whereas the cell density of phytoplankton in inflow rivers was dominated by Cyanophyta, Chlorophyta, and Bacillariophyta. In the inflow river area, the dominant species of cyanobacteria were , , and ; the dominant species of Chlorophyta were and ; and the dominant species of Bacillariophyta were and . The highest biodiversity (Shannon-Wiener Index, Pielou index, and Margalef index) were observed in the inflow river area of Hedi Reservoir. The correlation analysis (Pearson) indicated that the environmental factors that were significantly correlated to phytoplankton communities included water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, nitrogen, and phosphorus concentration. The RDA analysis indicated that phytoplankton communities in the inflow river area were mainly affected by pH and total nitrogen concentration, which were majorly affected by water temperature and pH in the estuarine area and chiefly affected by turbidity and pH in the reservoir. The pH affected the changes in phytoplankton communities in all three different habitats, whereas the inflow river area was significantly affected by total nitrogen concentration, and the estuarine and reservoir were significantly affected by water temperature and turbidity, respectively.
为探究鹤地水库不同生境中浮游植物群落特征及其与环境因子的关系,于2022年2月(枯水期)、4月(汛期)、7月(汛期)和12月(枯水期)对鹤地水库的入库河流、河口和库区进行了调查。调查期间,共鉴定出7门231种浮游植物,浮游植物细胞密度范围为2.94×10⁶ - 8.04×10⁶ cells·L⁻¹。浮游植物细胞密度汛期高于枯水期,河口和库区高于入库河流。同时,河口和库区浮游植物细胞密度全年以蓝藻为主,尤其是 ,而入库河流浮游植物细胞密度以蓝藻门、绿藻门和硅藻门为主。在入库河流区域,蓝藻优势种为 、 、 和 ;绿藻优势种为 和 ;硅藻优势种为 和 。鹤地水库入库河流区域的生物多样性(香农 - 威纳指数、皮洛指数和马加莱夫指数)最高。相关性分析(Pearson)表明,与浮游植物群落显著相关的环境因子包括水温、溶解氧、pH值、电导率、氮和磷浓度。冗余分析(RDA)表明,入库河流区域浮游植物群落主要受pH值和总氮浓度影响,河口区域主要受水温和pH值影响,库区主要受浊度和pH值影响。pH值影响了所有三个不同生境中浮游植物群落的变化,而入库河流区域受总氮浓度显著影响,河口和库区分别受水温和浊度显著影响。