Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Dec;133(6):1192-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.033. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
The EFFORT Protein trial assessed the effect of high vs usual dosing of protein in adult ICU patients with organ failure. This study provides a probabilistic interpretation and evaluates heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTE).
We analysed 60-day all-cause mortality and time to discharge alive from hospital using Bayesian models with weakly informative priors. HTE on mortality was assessed according to disease severity (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score), acute kidney injury, and serum creatinine values at baseline.
The absolute difference in mortality was 2.5% points (95% credible interval -6.9 to 12.4), with a 72% posterior probability of harm associated with high protein treatment. For time to discharge alive from hospital, the hazard ratio was 0.91 (95% credible interval 0.80 to 1.04) with a 92% probability of harm for the high-dose protein group compared with the usual-dose protein group. There were 97% and 95% probabilities of positive interactions between the high protein intervention and serum creatinine and SOFA score at randomisation, respectively. Specifically, there was a potentially relatively higher mortality of high protein doses with higher baseline serum creatinine or SOFA scores.
We found moderate to high probabilities of harm with high protein doses compared with usual protein in ICU patients for the primary and secondary outcomes. We found suggestions of heterogeneity in treatment effects with worse outcomes in participants randomised to high protein doses with renal dysfunction or acute kidney injury and greater illness severity at baseline.
EFFORT 蛋白试验评估了在器官衰竭的成年 ICU 患者中高剂量与常规剂量蛋白的效果。本研究提供了一种概率解释,并评估了治疗效果的异质性(HTE)。
我们使用具有弱信息先验的贝叶斯模型分析了 60 天全因死亡率和从医院出院的存活时间。根据疾病严重程度(序贯器官衰竭评估 [SOFA] 评分)、急性肾损伤和基线时的血清肌酐值评估死亡率的 HTE。
死亡率的绝对差异为 2.5%(95%可信区间-6.9 至 12.4),高蛋白治疗相关的危害后验概率为 72%。对于从医院出院的存活时间,危险比为 0.91(95%可信区间 0.80 至 1.04),与常规剂量蛋白组相比,高剂量蛋白组的危害后验概率为 92%。高蛋白干预与随机化时的血清肌酐和 SOFA 评分之间存在 97%和 95%的正交互作用的可能性。具体来说,基线血清肌酐或 SOFA 评分较高的患者,高剂量蛋白的死亡率可能相对较高。
与常规蛋白相比,我们发现 ICU 患者的主要和次要结局中,高剂量蛋白有中度到高度的危害可能性。我们发现治疗效果存在异质性的迹象,肾功能障碍或急性肾损伤患者和基线时疾病严重程度较高的患者随机分配到高剂量蛋白组时,结局较差。