• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用ALL-SAFE对利比里亚外科医生进行腹腔镜手术技能培训的实施科学策略分析。

Analysis of implementation science strategies to train laparoscopic surgical skills among Liberian surgeons using ALL-SAFE.

作者信息

Reynolds Christopher W, Cassell Ayun, Mabanza Tresor, Rooney Deborah M, Kollie Ronald, O'Reggio Rachel, Moore-Wilson Yarvoh, Ketia Aaron, Lemfuka Dieudonné A, Jeffcoach David, Kim Grace J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

John F. Kennedy Medical Center, 22nd St. & Tubman Blvd. Sinkor, Monrovia, Liberia.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):582-593. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11340-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-11340-6
PMID:39455451
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Significant disparities exist in laparoscopic training opportunities for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). ALL-SAFE is an innovative, low-cost training system for LMIC surgeons' laparoscopic development. However, strategies to implement and scale ALL-SAFE are unstudied. We aimed to assess the impact of implementation science strategies on ALL-SAFE uptake in Liberia, a novel and low-resource context.

METHODS

This study used implementation science approaches to evaluate ALL-SAFE uptake in three Liberian hospitals: John F. Kennedy Medical Center, Phebe, and ELWA. Five validated implementation strategies of program orientation, local champions, network weaving, feedback mechanisms, and practical supervision were piloted. All five strategies were implemented at two hospitals, while four strategies, excluding clinician supervision, were implemented at the final site as a pseudo-control, to evaluate the impact of resource-intensive supervision. Participants included surgical consultants, residents, and medical students. Engagement was assessed with mixed methods including participant number, practice hours, module completion rates, and strategy feasibility through end-user interviews.

RESULTS

Across three hospitals, 33 participants used ALL-SAFE for 87.8 total training hours (5,268 min). Participant numbers varied across sites (N = 20, 80%; N = 7, 88%; N = 6, 86%), as did practice times (Total = 3,060 min, Median time/Participant = 103 min; Total = 1,434 min, Median time/Participant = 126 min; Total = 774 min, Median time/Participant = 100 min). Sites with practical supervision demonstrated higher engagement than those without (P = 0.042). Interviews (n = 8) revealed positive perceptions toward program orientation, practical supervision, and network weaving. Participants recommended thirteen additional strategies for sustainability including translating ALL-SAFE skills to patient care.

CONCLUSION

Our study is one of the first to evaluate implementation science strategies for laparoscopic training in sub-Saharan Africa. The implementation bundles of five validated strategies were considered feasible by Liberian surgeons in both urban and rural hospitals. Mixed methods suggested a positive association between engagement and the resource-intensive practical supervision strategy. Future studies should focus on quantifying individual strategy contributions with rigorous implementation designs and assessing sustainability strategies.

摘要

背景

低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)外科医生的腹腔镜培训机会存在显著差异。ALL-SAFE是一种用于LMICs外科医生腹腔镜技术发展的创新型低成本培训系统。然而,实施和推广ALL-SAFE的策略尚未得到研究。我们旨在评估实施科学策略对利比里亚(一个新颖且资源匮乏的环境)采用ALL-SAFE的影响。

方法

本研究采用实施科学方法,在利比里亚的三家医院评估ALL-SAFE的采用情况:约翰·F·肯尼迪医疗中心、菲比医院和ELWA医院。试点了项目导向、当地倡导者、网络编织、反馈机制和实践监督这五种经过验证的实施策略。所有五种策略在两家医院实施,而在最后一家医院作为伪对照实施了四种策略(不包括临床医生监督),以评估资源密集型监督的影响。参与者包括外科顾问、住院医生和医学生。通过混合方法评估参与情况,包括参与者数量、练习时间、模块完成率以及通过终端用户访谈评估策略的可行性。

结果

在三家医院中,33名参与者使用ALL-SAFE进行了总计87.8小时(5268分钟)的培训。各地点的参与者数量有所不同(分别为N = 20,80%;N = 7,88%;N = 6,86%),练习时间也不同(总计分别为3060分钟,参与者平均时间为103分钟;总计1434分钟,参与者平均时间为126分钟;总计774分钟,参与者平均时间为100分钟)。有实践监督的地点比没有实践监督的地点参与度更高(P = 0.042)。访谈(n = 8)显示对项目导向、实践监督和网络编织有积极看法。参与者推荐了另外13种可持续性策略,包括将ALL-SAFE技能应用于患者护理。

结论

我们的研究是首批评估撒哈拉以南非洲腹腔镜培训实施科学策略的研究之一。利比里亚城乡医院的外科医生认为这五种经过验证的策略组合是可行的。混合方法表明参与度与资源密集型实践监督策略之间存在正相关。未来的研究应侧重于通过严格的实施设计量化各个策略的贡献,并评估可持续性策略。

相似文献

1
Analysis of implementation science strategies to train laparoscopic surgical skills among Liberian surgeons using ALL-SAFE.使用ALL-SAFE对利比里亚外科医生进行腹腔镜手术技能培训的实施科学策略分析。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):582-593. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11340-6. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Assessment of laparoscopic surgery practice, knowledge, and training goals in Liberia: A mixed-methods study among Liberian surgeons.利比里亚腹腔镜手术实践、知识和培训目标评估:利比里亚外科医生的混合方法研究。
World J Surg. 2024 Oct;48(10):2421-2432. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12330. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
3
Advancing laparoscopic skills training in Namibia: Implementation of the Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).在纳米比亚推进腹腔镜技能培训:美国胃肠和内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)全球腹腔镜技术提升项目(GLAP)的实施情况。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1290-1298. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11439-w. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
Use of virtual platform for delivery of simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum in LMICs.在低收入和中等收入国家使用虚拟平台提供基于模拟的腹腔镜培训课程。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1528-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09438-w. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Take-Home Training in Laparoscopy.腹腔镜手术的居家培训
Dan Med J. 2017 Apr;64(4).
6
Evidence supporting performance measures of laparoscopic appendectomy through a novel surgical proficiency assessment tool and low-cost laparoscopic training system.支持通过新型手术熟练程度评估工具和低成本腹腔镜培训系统评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术表现的证据。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7170-7177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10182-y. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
A needs assessment for simulation in African surgical education.非洲外科学模拟教学需求评估。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1654-1661. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10665-y. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
The Successful Implementation of a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国成功实施腹腔镜模拟培训计划。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
9
The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.正式机器人住院医师培训对年轻结直肠外科医师采用微创手术的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2018 May-Jun;75(3):767-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
Implementation of a Technology-Based Mobile Obstetric Referral Emergency System (MORES): Qualitative Assessment of Health Workers in Rural Liberia.基于技术的移动产科转诊应急系统(MORES)的实施:对利比里亚农村地区卫生工作者的定性评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Nov 13;12:e58624. doi: 10.2196/58624.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of laparoscopic surgery practice, knowledge, and training goals in Liberia: A mixed-methods study among Liberian surgeons.利比里亚腹腔镜手术实践、知识和培训目标评估:利比里亚外科医生的混合方法研究。
World J Surg. 2024 Oct;48(10):2421-2432. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12330. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
First experience in laparoscopic surgery in low and middle income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家腹腔镜手术的首次经验:一项系统综述。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):546-553. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.546.
3
Minimally invasive thoracic surgery in Sierra Leone and Liberia.
在塞拉利昂和利比里亚开展的微创胸外科手术。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Jan;12(1):19-20. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00464-2.
4
Exploring Laparoscopic Surgery Training Opportunities in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa region.探索东非、中非和南非外科医生学院的腹腔镜手术培训机会。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Oct;80(10):1454-1461. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.07.024. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Defining a Framework and Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable Global Surgical Partnerships: A Modified Delphi Study.定义可持续全球外科伙伴关系的框架和评估指标:一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Mar 1;279(3):549-553. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006058. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
6
Evidence supporting performance measures of laparoscopic appendectomy through a novel surgical proficiency assessment tool and low-cost laparoscopic training system.支持通过新型手术熟练程度评估工具和低成本腹腔镜培训系统评估腹腔镜阑尾切除术表现的证据。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Sep;37(9):7170-7177. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10182-y. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
7
Use of Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) in oncology: systematic review of published studies.序贯多项适应性随机试验(SMARTs)在肿瘤学中的应用:已发表研究的系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Mar;128(7):1177-1188. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02110-z. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
8
Mapping population access to essential surgical care in Liberia using equipment, personnel, and bellwether capability standards.利用设备、人员和基准能力标准绘制利比里亚基本外科护理的人口可及性图谱。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jan 10;110(2):169-176. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac377.
9
The Successful Implementation of a Laparoscopic Simulation Training Program in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国成功实施腹腔镜模拟培训计划。
J Surg Res. 2022 Oct;278:337-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.04.020. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
10
Establishing a Sustainable Training Program for Laparoscopy in Resource-Limited Settings: Experience in Ghana.在资源有限的环境中建立可持续的腹腔镜培训项目:加纳的经验。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Jul 30;86(1):89. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2957.