Teumer Yannick, Eckart Daniel, Katov Lyuboslav, Graf Markus, Bothner Carlo, Rottbauer Wolfgang, Weinmann-Emhardt Karolina
Ulm University Heart Center, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 80333 Munich, Germany.
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 17;12(10):2375. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102375.
: In electrophysiological procedures, multiple punctures on the femoral vein can be necessary depending on the number of catheters required. The femoral vein is typically located indirectly by using its anatomical relationship to the artery as a reference. However, this conventional approach can lead to significant complications, including bleeding, peri-interventional transfusion, pseudoaneurysms, or arteriovenous fistulas. Despite these risks, there is limited evidence comparing the safety of ultrasound-guided venipuncture versus the conventional technique in electrophysiological procedures. : This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ultrasound-guided venipuncture on vascular access complications in electrophysiological procedures and to identify associated risk factors. Methods: In this single-center trial, patients scheduled for electrophysiological procedures at Ulm University Heart Center, Germany, were enrolled between November 2021 and October 2023. Venipuncture in the groin was performed using either the conventional or an ultrasound-guided approach. The primary composite endpoint was defined as peri-interventional major vascular access complications (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) ≥2 bleeding, pseudoaneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, and peri-interventional transfusion) and minor complications (BARC 1). : A total of 1370 patients were included: 749 in the conventional group and 621 in the ultrasound group. The primary endpoint was achieved in 19.2% of the conventional group and 12.1% of the ultrasound group ( < 0.001). An increased sheath diameter and a higher number of venous accesses were identified as risk factors for the primary endpoint. : Ultrasound guidance for venous groin puncture in electrophysiological procedures reduces access-related complications, supporting its use with careful attention to sheath size and number.
在电生理手术中,根据所需导管的数量,可能需要对股静脉进行多次穿刺。股静脉通常通过利用其与动脉的解剖关系作为参考来间接定位。然而,这种传统方法可能会导致严重的并发症,包括出血、介入期间输血、假性动脉瘤或动静脉瘘。尽管存在这些风险,但在电生理手术中,比较超声引导下静脉穿刺与传统技术安全性的证据有限。本研究旨在评估超声引导下静脉穿刺对电生理手术中血管通路并发症的影响,并确定相关危险因素。方法:在这项单中心试验中,2021年11月至2023年10月期间,德国乌尔姆大学心脏中心计划进行电生理手术的患者入组。腹股沟静脉穿刺采用传统方法或超声引导方法。主要复合终点定义为介入期间主要血管通路并发症(出血学术研究联盟(BARC)≥2级出血、假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘和介入期间输血)和次要并发症(BARC 1级)。共纳入1370例患者:传统组749例,超声组621例。传统组19.2%的患者达到主要终点,超声组为12.1%(<0.001)。鞘管直径增加和静脉穿刺次数增加被确定为主要终点的危险因素。在电生理手术中,超声引导下腹股沟静脉穿刺可减少与通路相关的并发症,支持在仔细关注鞘管大小和数量的情况下使用。