• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者与年轻患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)结果及并发症风险的比较:一项大型单中心研究

Comparison of ERCP Outcomes and Complication Risk between Elderly and Younger Patients: A Large Single-Center Study.

作者信息

Cagir Yavuz, Durak Muhammed Bahaddin, Simsek Cem, Yuksel Ilhami

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.

Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06230, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6112. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206112.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13206112
PMID:39458061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11508533/
Abstract

The current study compared potential risks, complications, and the impact on clinical outcomes among elderly and younger patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Procedure-related complications, risk factors, and clinical outcomes following complications in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) and younger who underwent biliary ERCP were evaluated. Median age of 63 (48-74) of 1164 patients who underwent biliary ERCP for the first time, and 266 (22.8%) were elderly. Comorbidities were statistically significant (81 [30.5%] versus 78 [8.7%], < 0.001), and periampullary diverticulum (PAD) was detected more commonly in the elderly group (79 [29.7%] vs. 103 [11.5%], < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in cannulation technique, cannulation time, and cannulation success in both groups, while the total ERCP procedure time was higher in the elderly group (22 [16-29] vs. 20 [14-29], = 0.030). Regarding the procedure-related complications, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (26 [9.8%] vs. 71 [7.9%], = 0.292). In the case of complications, the length of hospitalization stay was statistically longer in the elderly group. Moreover, the elderly had a longer length of hospitalization, experiencing pancreatitis and a higher probability of developing moderate/severe pancreatitis. In multivariate and univariate analysis, prolonged cannulation time was found to be an independent risk factor in patients ≥75 years of age. This study showed that while ERCP-related complication rates in elderly patients are comparable to younger patients, it can be associated with worse outcomes following the complication and prolonged length of hospitalization.

摘要

本研究比较了接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的老年患者和年轻患者的潜在风险、并发症以及对临床结局的影响。评估了老年患者(年龄≥75岁)和接受胆管ERCP的年轻患者的手术相关并发症、风险因素及并发症后的临床结局。1164例首次接受胆管ERCP的患者的中位年龄为63岁(48 - 74岁),其中266例(22.8%)为老年患者。合并症具有统计学意义(81例[30.5%]对78例[8.7%],<0.001),且老年组壶腹周围憩室(PAD)的检出率更高(79例[29.7%]对103例[11.5%],<0.001)。两组在插管技术、插管时间和插管成功率方面无统计学差异,而老年组的ERCP总手术时间更长(22分钟[16 - 29分钟]对20分钟[14 - 29分钟],P = 0.030)。关于手术相关并发症,两组之间无统计学差异(26例[9.8%]对71例[7.9%],P = 0.292)。发生并发症时,老年组的住院时间在统计学上更长。此外,老年患者住院时间更长,发生胰腺炎的概率更高,且发生中度/重度胰腺炎的可能性更大。在多因素和单因素分析中,发现插管时间延长是75岁及以上患者的独立危险因素。本研究表明,虽然老年患者ERCP相关并发症发生率与年轻患者相当,但并发症后的结局可能更差,住院时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeef/11508533/3ea2223ce9fe/jcm-13-06112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeef/11508533/3ea2223ce9fe/jcm-13-06112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eeef/11508533/3ea2223ce9fe/jcm-13-06112-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of ERCP Outcomes and Complication Risk between Elderly and Younger Patients: A Large Single-Center Study.老年患者与年轻患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)结果及并发症风险的比较:一项大型单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 14;13(20):6112. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206112.
2
Impact of periampullary diverticulum on biliary cannulation and ERCP outcomes: a single-center experience.十二指肠乳头旁憩室对胆管插管和 ERCP 结果的影响:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):5953-5961. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08080-8. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
The impact of periampullary diverticula on cannulation and adverse events in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.壶腹周围憩室对内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中插管及不良事件的影响。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 5;17:17562848241279105. doi: 10.1177/17562848241279105. eCollection 2024.
4
The role of periampullary diverticulum on the incidence of pancreaticobiliary diseases and the outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.壶腹周围憩室在胰胆疾病发生率及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术结果中的作用。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Apr 22;17(4):905-914. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94591. eCollection 2021.
5
The presence of periampullary diverticulum increased the complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.壶腹周围憩室的存在增加了内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的并发症。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep;30(9):1009-1012. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001172.
6
Factors and techniques associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outcomes in patients with periampullary diverticulum: Results from a large tertiary center.与十二指肠乳头旁憩室患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术结果相关的因素和技术:来自一个大型三级中心的结果。
Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2023 Jan-Feb;29(1):12-20. doi: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_311_22.
7
Efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in patients with Periampullary duodenal diverticula (PAD).壶腹周围十二指肠憩室(PAD)患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的疗效与安全性。
Clin Ter. 2014;165(4):e291-4. doi: 10.7417/CT.2014.1745.
8
Impact of periampullary diverticula on the outcome and fluoroscopy time in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.胆胰管内镜逆行造影中壶腹周围憩室对治疗结果和透视时间的影响。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Aug;12(4):408-14. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60063-6.
9
Choledocholithiasis characteristics with periampullary diverticulum and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: Comparison between two centers from Lanzhou and Kyoto.胆总管结石合并壶腹周围憩室的特征及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:兰州和京都两个中心的比较
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Feb 27;14(2):132-142. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.132.
10
ERCP in patients with periampullary diverticulum.壶腹周围憩室患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):625-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-Term Patency of Plastic Stents in Elderly Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Pilot Study.老年胆总管结石患者塑料支架的长期通畅性:一项前瞻性初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 12;14(16):5715. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165715.
2
Optimal timing for discontinuation of ERCP in cases of difficult selective biliary cannulation.困难选择性胆管插管病例中内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)终止的最佳时机。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Apr 4;13:a25368241. doi: 10.1055/a-2536-8241. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancements in Managing Choledocholithiasis and Acute Cholangitis in the Elderly: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of ERCP complications.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术并发症的处理。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar;69:101897. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101897. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
2
Trainee Involvement and ERCP Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.实习生参与与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术并发症:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Jul;69(7):2363-2369. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08452-3. Epub 2024 May 7.
3
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the management of choledocholithiasis in older patients.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗老年胆石症。
老年患者胆总管结石及急性胆管炎管理的进展:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78492. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78492. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2024 May;116(5):244-249. doi: 10.17235/reed.2023.10051/2023.
4
ERCP in patients over 90 years old: Safety and efficacy comparison with a younger cohort.90岁以上患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术:与较年轻队列的安全性和疗效比较。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Oct 6;11(9):E893-E898. doi: 10.1055/a-2153-7094. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Large common bile duct stones in high-risk elderly patients: Immediate endoscopic stone removal or elective stone removal? A single-center retrospective study.高龄高危患者的较大胆总管结石:即刻内镜取石还是择期取石?一项单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02976-0.
6
EUS-Guided Choledocho-duodenostomy Using Lumen Apposing Stent Versus ERCP With Covered Metallic Stents in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (DRA-MBO Trial).超声内镜引导下胆管十二指肠吻合术(使用双猪尾塑料支架)与经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(使用覆膜金属支架)治疗不可切除的恶性远端胆道梗阻患者的多中心随机对照研究(DRA-MBO 试验)。
Gastroenterology. 2023 Aug;165(2):473-482.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.04.016. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events in Korea: A nationwide assessment.韩国内镜逆行胰胆管造影相关不良事件:一项全国性评估。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2022 Feb;10(1):73-79. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12186. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
Impact of periampullary diverticulum on biliary cannulation and ERCP outcomes: a single-center experience.十二指肠乳头旁憩室对胆管插管和 ERCP 结果的影响:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):5953-5961. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08080-8. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Clinical significance of different periampullary diverticulum classifications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cannulation.不同壶腹周围憩室分类对内镜逆行胰胆管造影插管的临床意义。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 May 21;26(19):2403-2415. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i19.2403.
10
Does periampullary diverticulum affect ERCP cannulation and post-procedure complications? an up-to-date meta-analysis.十二指肠乳头旁憩室是否会影响 ERCP 插管和术后并发症?一项最新的荟萃分析。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;31(3):193-204. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19058.