Mele Giuseppe, Sgherza Nicola, Pastore Domenico, Musto Pellegrino
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, "Antonio Perrino" Hospital, 72100 Brindisi, Italy.
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, AOUC Policlinico, 70124 Bari, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 19;13(20):6238. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206238.
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after exposure to lenalidomide in the context of their first-line therapy are becoming a growing and clinically relevant population. We performed a systematic review of available clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse after the frontline use of lenalidomide. Publications of interest were searched on the PubMed database. The following search terms were employed: relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, first relapse, second-line therapy, lenalidomide-refractory (Len-R) and lenalidomide-exposed (Len-Exp). Overall, triplet regimens that included anti-CD38 antibodies, carfilzomib and dexamethasone achieved a more favorable PFS regardless of the number of prior therapies. Other trials also demonstrated a non-negligible benefit with combinations containing pomalidomide, particularly in early lines of therapy. However, the variable number of patients with Len-Exp/Len-R disease enrolled in these studies and the limited number of those analyzed after progression following frontline lenalidomide make it difficult to select an "optimal" choice for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse. Promising results have been more recently obtained by using combo therapies, including belantamab mafodotin and, above all, immunotherapies with CAR-T cells, and ongoing clinical trials are exploring the role of bispecific antibodies and CELMoDs in this population of patients. In the absence of clear-cut data regarding the specific effects of available regimens on patients with MM who are refractory or have relapsed after first-line therapies including lenalidomide, novel approaches based on different types of immune strategies are expected to further improve the clinical outcome of these patients.
在一线治疗中接受来那度胺治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者正成为一个不断增长且具有临床相关性的群体。我们对现有临床试验进行了系统评价,以评估不同治疗策略在来那度胺一线治疗后首次复发的MM患者中的疗效和安全性。在PubMed数据库中搜索了相关出版物。使用了以下检索词:复发多发性骨髓瘤、难治性多发性骨髓瘤、首次复发、二线治疗、来那度胺难治性(Len-R)和来那度胺暴露(Len-Exp)。总体而言,无论既往治疗次数如何,包含抗CD38抗体、卡非佐米和地塞米松的三联方案均取得了更有利的无进展生存期(PFS)。其他试验也证明含泊马度胺的联合方案有不可忽视的益处,尤其是在早期治疗中。然而,这些研究中纳入的Len-Exp/Len-R疾病患者数量各不相同,且一线来那度胺治疗进展后进行分析的患者数量有限,这使得难以选择“最佳”方案来治疗首次复发的MM患者。最近,通过使用联合疗法,包括贝兰他单抗马福多汀,尤其是嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)免疫疗法,已取得了有前景的结果,并且正在进行的临床试验正在探索双特异性抗体和免疫调节剂(CELMoDs)在这类患者中的作用。在缺乏关于现有方案对难治性或一线来那度胺治疗后复发的MM患者具体影响的确切数据的情况下,基于不同类型免疫策略的新方法有望进一步改善这些患者的临床结局。