Suppr超能文献

用于血清型检测的Novaplex多重实时荧光定量PCR检测方法的性能评估

Performance Evaluation of Novaplex Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Serotypes.

作者信息

Handigund Mallikarjun, Lee Jaehyeon

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea.

Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju 54907, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2024 Oct 10;12(10):2043. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12102043.

Abstract

, or group B streptococcus (GBS), is a Gram-positive pathogen with an extended track record of colonization in the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts. GBS can induce disease in individuals across all age demographics, yet it predominantly triggers infections in neonates and the elderly. Identification of the serotype is vital for effective management of the disease as it provides critical information for clinicians on the cause of the disease. In this study, we evaluated the rapid, simple, and easy-to-adopt multiplex real-time PCR technique, Novaplex (NovaPCR). A total of 131 clinical isolates of different serotypes were tested using NovaPCR. Observations revealed that 129 isolates showed the same observations as LA and conventional mPCR. NovaPCR accurately identified serotypes IV and V, which were first classified as serotype Ia in the LA test and mPCR, and the difference between the traditional (LA test and mPCR) and NovaPCR methods is only 1.52%. Accurate serotype identification is helpful for monitoring the epidemics and achieving optimal clinical outcomes, and NovaPCR showed a reliable, fast, easy-to-interpret, and cost-efficient performance in GBS serotyping.

摘要

B族链球菌(GBS)是一种革兰氏阳性病原体,在胃肠道和泌尿生殖道中有长期的定植记录。GBS可在所有年龄段的个体中引发疾病,但主要在新生儿和老年人中引发感染。血清型的鉴定对于疾病的有效管理至关重要,因为它为临床医生提供了关于疾病病因的关键信息。在本研究中,我们评估了快速、简单且易于采用的多重实时PCR技术——Novaplex(NovaPCR)。使用NovaPCR对总共131株不同血清型的临床分离株进行了检测。观察结果显示,129株分离株的检测结果与乳胶凝集试验(LA)和传统多重PCR(mPCR)相同。NovaPCR准确鉴定出血清型IV和V,这两种血清型在LA试验和mPCR中最初被归类为血清型Ia,传统方法(LA试验和mPCR)与NovaPCR方法之间的差异仅为1.52%。准确的血清型鉴定有助于监测疫情并实现最佳临床结果,NovaPCR在GBS血清分型中表现出可靠、快速、易于解读且经济高效的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dbf/11510028/3f9155e26cd6/microorganisms-12-02043-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验