Opacic Dragan, Klüß Christian, Radakovic Darko, El-Hachem Georges, Becker Tobias, Rudloff Markus, Lauenroth Volker, Deutsch Marcus-André, Velasquez-Silva Claudio, Fox Henrik, Schramm René, Morshuis Michiel, Gummert Jan F, Rojas Sebastian V
Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine Westphalia, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Faculty of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 7;14(10):1274. doi: 10.3390/life14101274.
Acute right ventricular failure is a critical complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, often managed with a temporary paracorporeal right ventricular assist device (RVAD). This study examined three extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems regarding mortality, bleeding complications, and intensive care unit (ICU) stay duration.
This monocentric, retrospective case-control study included all patients receiving LVAD with paracorporeal RVAD between 2009 and 2020. Three patient groups were formed: Centrimag (A), Cardiohelp (B), and Deltastream (C).
A total of 245 patients were included. Preoperative parameters were similar between the Centrimag and Deltastream groups, but Cardiohelp patients had worse Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Scores (A: 1.7 ± 0.8, B: 1.36 ± 0.5, C: 1.9 ± 0.9; < 0.05). In-hospital death rates were A: 61 (41.8%), B: 15 (32.6%), C: 29 (54.7%); < 0.05, and reoperation due to bleeding rates were A: 32 (21.9%), B: 8 (17.4%), C: 25 (47.2%); < 0.05, with the Deltastream group showing the highest rates. This group also had increased thrombocyte consumption and prolonged ICU stays.
Temporary RVADs lead to bleeding complications, affecting patient outcomes. The Deltastream group had significantly higher bleeding complications, likely due to high pump revolution rates and thrombocyte decline. Due to the study's retrospective nature and complex patient profiles, these interesting findings should be validated in future studies.
急性右心室衰竭是左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后的一种严重并发症,通常采用临时体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持治疗。本研究比较了三种体外生命支持(ECLS)系统在死亡率、出血并发症和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间方面的差异。
本单中心回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2009年至2020年间接受LVAD联合体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持治疗的所有患者。将患者分为三组:Centrimag(A组)、Cardiohelp(B组)和Deltastream(C组)。
共纳入245例患者。Centrimag组和Deltastream组术前参数相似,但Cardiohelp组患者的机构间机械辅助循环支持注册系统(INTERMACS)评分较差(A组:1.7±0.8,B组:1.36±0.5,C组:1.9±0.9;P<0.05)。住院死亡率分别为A组:61例(41.8%),B组:15例(32.6%),C组:29例(54.7%);P<0.05,因出血而再次手术的发生率分别为A组:32例(21.9%),B组:8例(17.4%),C组:25例(47.2%);P<0.05,Deltastream组发生率最高。该组还存在血小板消耗增加和ICU住院时间延长的情况。
临时体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持治疗会导致出血并发症,影响患者预后。Deltastream组的出血并发症显著更高,可能是由于泵转速高和血小板减少所致。由于本研究的回顾性性质和患者情况复杂,这些有趣的发现应在未来的研究中得到验证。