• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

点荷载指数和巴西劈裂抗拉强度在预测岩石单轴抗压强度方面的准确性:一项比较研究。

Accuracy of Point Load Index and Brazilian Tensile Strength in Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of the Rocks: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Jamshidi Amin, Sousa Luís

机构信息

Department of Geology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad 681151-44316, Iran.

Department of Geology and Pole of Geosciences Center, University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;17(20):5081. doi: 10.3390/ma17205081.

DOI:10.3390/ma17205081
PMID:39459786
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11509414/
Abstract

Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks is one of the main parameters required in the design of geotechnical projects such as tunnels, dams, or rock slopes. According to the literature, there are a large number of predictive regression equations to evaluate the UCS from the point load index (PLI) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS). However, the equations developed in previous studies have different accuracies in UCS prediction. A more accurate prediction of the UCS will result in a more appropriate design of the geotechnical project, and thus ensure its success during operation. In the present paper, a comparative study was conducted between the accuracy of PLI and BTS in predicting the UCS of the limestone and sandstone. Moreover, the role of porosity (n) on the accuracy of predicting the UCS from PLI and BTS was investigated. Some statistical indices were used to investigating the accuracy of predictive regression equations of UCS. The results revealed that the UCS of rocks can be predicted with a higher accuracy using BTS compared with PLI. Also, the findings showed that the n had a significant role in increasing the accuracy of PLI- and BTS-based regression equations of the UCS predictive. The predictive equations established in the present study can be used in practical applications for indirect evaluation of limestone and sandstone UCS in the site of a geotechnical project.

摘要

岩石的单轴抗压强度(UCS)是隧道、大坝或岩石边坡等岩土工程项目设计所需的主要参数之一。根据文献,有大量预测回归方程可从点荷载指数(PLI)和巴西抗拉强度(BTS)来评估UCS。然而,先前研究中开发的方程在UCS预测方面具有不同的准确性。对UCS进行更准确的预测将导致岩土工程项目设计更合理,从而确保其在运营期间取得成功。在本文中,对PLI和BTS预测石灰岩和砂岩UCS的准确性进行了比较研究。此外,研究了孔隙率(n)对从PLI和BTS预测UCS准确性的影响。使用了一些统计指标来研究UCS预测回归方程的准确性。结果表明,与PLI相比,使用BTS可以更准确地预测岩石的UCS。研究结果还表明,n在提高基于PLI和BTS的UCS预测回归方程的准确性方面具有重要作用。本研究建立的预测方程可用于岩土工程项目现场石灰岩和砂岩UCS的间接评估实际应用中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/d9ecb9359477/materials-17-05081-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/0980ca50d262/materials-17-05081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/18baefd065fe/materials-17-05081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/5137c3a6a5aa/materials-17-05081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/5e6e6519f553/materials-17-05081-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/dd9b8787045c/materials-17-05081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/9763059563a5/materials-17-05081-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/59f852c5caac/materials-17-05081-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/2905977aed9b/materials-17-05081-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/d9ecb9359477/materials-17-05081-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/0980ca50d262/materials-17-05081-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/18baefd065fe/materials-17-05081-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/5137c3a6a5aa/materials-17-05081-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/5e6e6519f553/materials-17-05081-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/dd9b8787045c/materials-17-05081-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/9763059563a5/materials-17-05081-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/59f852c5caac/materials-17-05081-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/2905977aed9b/materials-17-05081-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af37/11509414/d9ecb9359477/materials-17-05081-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Accuracy of Point Load Index and Brazilian Tensile Strength in Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of the Rocks: A Comparative Study.点荷载指数和巴西劈裂抗拉强度在预测岩石单轴抗压强度方面的准确性:一项比较研究。
Materials (Basel). 2024 Oct 18;17(20):5081. doi: 10.3390/ma17205081.
2
Comprehensive study on the Python-based regression machine learning models for prediction of uniaxial compressive strength using multiple parameters in Charnockite rocks.基于Python的回归机器学习模型用于利用查诺基石中多个参数预测单轴抗压强度的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 28;14(1):7360. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58001-1.
3
Determination of Drilling Rate Index Based on Rock Strength Using Regression Analysis.基于岩石强度通过回归分析确定钻速指数
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019 Oct 14;91(3):e20181095. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201920181095. eCollection 2019.
4
Strength Characteristics, Ultrasonic Wave Velocity, and the Correlation between Them in Clay Bricks under Dry and Saturated Conditions.干燥和饱和条件下黏土砖的强度特性、超声波速度及其相关性
Materials (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;17(6):1353. doi: 10.3390/ma17061353.
5
Comparative study on convolutional neural network and regression analysis to evaluate uniaxial compressive strength of Sandy Dolomite.卷积神经网络与回归分析用于评估砂质白云岩单轴抗压强度的对比研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60085-8.
6
Experimental Study on Mechanical Characteristics and Fracture Patterns of Unfrozen/Freezing Saturated Coal and Sandstone.非冻结/冻结饱和煤与砂岩力学特性及破裂模式的试验研究
Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 26;12(6):992. doi: 10.3390/ma12060992.
7
Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks using ANN models: Incorporating porosity, compressional wave velocity, and schmidt hammer data.使用人工神经网络模型预测岩石的单轴抗压强度:纳入孔隙率、压缩波速度和施密特锤数据。
Ultrasonics. 2024 Jul;141:107347. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107347. Epub 2024 May 20.
8
Effect of Physical Properties on Mechanical Behaviors of Sandstone under Uniaxial and Triaxial Compressions.物理性质对砂岩在单轴和三轴压缩下力学行为的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;16(13):4867. doi: 10.3390/ma16134867.
9
HYFIS vs FMR, LWR and Least squares regression methods in estimating uniaxial compressive strength of evaporitic rocks.在估算蒸发岩单轴抗压强度方面,HYFIS与FMR、LWR及最小二乘法回归方法的比较
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 29;13(1):14101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41349-1.
10
Statistical models for estimating the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of rocks from different hardness test methods.用于从不同硬度测试方法估算岩石单轴抗压强度和弹性模量的统计模型。
Heliyon. 2021 May 1;7(5):e06891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06891. eCollection 2021 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-destructive test-based assessment of uniaxial compressive strength and elasticity modulus of intact carbonate rocks using stacking ensemble models.基于堆叠集成模型的完整碳酸盐岩单轴抗压强度和弹性模量的无损检测评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0302944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302944. eCollection 2024.
2
Statistical models for estimating the uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of rocks from different hardness test methods.用于从不同硬度测试方法估算岩石单轴抗压强度和弹性模量的统计模型。
Heliyon. 2021 May 1;7(5):e06891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06891. eCollection 2021 May.