• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

串联性闭塞急诊颈动脉支架置入术的抗血小板方案特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Profile of antiplatelet regimens for emergent carotid stenting in tandem occlusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic, UOC of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

Department of Neuroscience, UOC Neurology, S Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108595. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108595. Epub 2024 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108595
PMID:39461305
Abstract

AIM

To investigate the optimum antiplatelet therapy regimen (APTR) for emergent carotid artery stenting following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients with tandem occlusion.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on Pubmed/OVID/Cochran's CENTRAL database for studies from 2015 to 2022. Patient characteristics, antiplatelet regimen type, mTICI, 90 days-mRS, acute in-stent thrombosis (AIST), mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and sample size were recorded. Exclusion criteria were non-English literature, sample size < 5 patients, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, and 100 % stent insertion in one study arm. The studies were assessed using MINORS/GRADE. Meta-analysis and meta-regression with a random effects model were performed. The outcomes were: 90 days-mRS, death, AIST and ICH RESULTS: Five-hundred-twenty-four studies were retrieved. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final population included 19/534 studies (3.6 %) for 880 patients (46.3 per article). I^2 and Q's Cochrane were 86.4 % and 132.5 for mRS, 19.9 % and 17.5 for death, 0 % and 9.4 for acute in-stent thrombosis and 62.1 % and 39.7 for intra-cranial haemorrhages, respectively. Patients in the aspirin subgroup had a significantly lower rate of functional independence (mRS≤2) than those in the DAPT subgroup (47 % [CI95 % 42.0 %-52.0 %] vs. 61.9 % [CI95 % 50.8-72.9]; p=0.0007;OR 0.75[CI95 % 0.56-1.01], p=0.06). DAPT significantly decreased the death rate compared with aspirin (8.6 % [CI95 % 5.3 %-11.9 %] vs. 16.7 % [CI95 11.1 %-22.2 %]; p=0.0012). Anti-GPIIb/IIIa demonstrated a trend of increasing the probability of mortality versus DAPT (OR 1.88[CI95 % 0.93-3.86], p=0.08. No significant differences were observed between AIST and ICH in the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

DAPT may increases the chance of obtaining an mRS score ≤2 and reduces mortality.

摘要

目的

探讨血栓切除术(MT)后紧急颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)中串联闭塞的卒中患者的最佳抗血小板治疗方案(APTR)。

方法

在 Pubmed/OVID/Cochran 的 CENTRAL 数据库中对 2015 年至 2022 年的文献进行了检索。记录患者特征、抗血小板方案类型、mTICI、90 天 mRS、急性支架内血栓形成(AIST)、死亡率、颅内出血(ICH)和样本量。排除标准为非英文文献、样本量<5 例、其他抗凝/抗血小板治疗、以及在一个研究臂中 100%支架置入。采用 MINORS/GRADE 对研究进行评估。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归。结果:共检索到 524 项研究。应用排除标准后,最终纳入 19/534 项研究(3.6%),共 880 例患者(每项研究 46.3 例)。mRS 的 I^2 和 Q 的 Cochrane 分别为 86.4%和 132.5%,死亡的 I^2 和 Q 的 Cochrane 分别为 19.9%和 17.5%,急性支架内血栓形成的 I^2 和 Q 的 Cochrane 分别为 0%和 9.4%,颅内出血的 I^2 和 Q 的 Cochrane 分别为 62.1%和 39.7%。阿司匹林亚组的功能独立性(mRS≤2)率明显低于 DAPT 亚组(47%[95%CI95%42.0%-52.0%] vs. 61.9%[95%CI95%50.8%-72.9%];p=0.0007;OR 0.75[95%CI95%0.56-1.01],p=0.06)。与阿司匹林相比,DAPT 显著降低死亡率(8.6%[95%CI95%5.3%-11.9%] vs. 16.7%[95%CI95%11.1%-22.2%];p=0.0012)。与 DAPT 相比,抗 GPIIb/IIIa 增加了死亡率的可能性(OR 1.88[95%CI95%0.93-3.86],p=0.08)。各组间 AIST 和 ICH 无显著差异。

结论

DAPT 可能增加获得 mRS 评分≤2 的机会,并降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
Profile of antiplatelet regimens for emergent carotid stenting in tandem occlusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis.串联性闭塞急诊颈动脉支架置入术的抗血小板方案特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108595. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108595. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
Cangrelor for emergent carotid stenting during stroke thrombectomy: a comparative analysis versus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or aspirin monotherapy.坎格雷洛用于卒中取栓术中紧急颈动脉支架置入术:与糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂或阿司匹林单药治疗的对比分析
J Neurointerv Surg. 2025 Jun 1;17(e2):e269-e275. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2024-022125.
3
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术联合与不联合静脉溶栓治疗的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 24;4(4):CD015721. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015721.pub2.
4
Editor's Choice - Peri-Operative Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy are Not Improved on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs. Aspirin Monotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.编辑精选 - 与阿司匹林单药治疗相比,双重抗血小板治疗并未改善颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Apr;63(4):546-555. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.037. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Antithrombotic treatment after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage.脑出血所致脑卒中后的抗血栓治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 26;1(1):CD012144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012144.pub3.
6
Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Anterior Ischemic Stroke with Tandem Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.串联闭塞性急性前循环缺血性卒中的支架取栓术:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jan;27(1):247-254. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4338-y. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
7
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中时的颈动脉假性闭塞:一项比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.
8
Dipyridamole for preventing stroke and other vascular events in patients with vascular disease.双嘧达莫用于预防血管疾病患者的中风及其他血管事件。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD001820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001820.
9
Type of anaesthesia for acute ischaemic stroke endovascular treatment.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的麻醉类型。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 20;7(7):CD013690. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013690.pub2.
10
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Systematic Review for the 2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.双联抗血小板治疗的疗程:针对2016年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于冠心病患者双联抗血小板治疗疗程重点更新指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2016 Sep 6;134(10):e156-78. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000405. Epub 2016 Mar 29.