From the Department of Radiology (M.A.T., J.C., S.G., R.K., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine (T.M.), Rochester, Minnesota.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.
The effective treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with cervical internal carotid pseudo-occlusion (cICA-PO) requires comprehensive research on the safety and outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). However, there are limited data available, highlighting the need for further research to ensure better treatment strategies and improve the quality of care for these patients.
This study aims to assess the management and outcomes in this population group compared with patients with true carotid occlusion.
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted by using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception to November 2023.
The size of the included studies ranged from 16 patients to 146 patients. Through the 4 full-text articles, a total of 259 patients were collected. We compared outcomes between patients with cICA-PO compared with patients with true carotid occlusions undergoing EVT due to AIS. We excluded studies with patients with carotid pseudo-occlusion without stroke, review articles, duplicate studies, overlapped data that included the same patients presented in another included study, case reports, case series with fewer than 5 patients, and meeting abstracts that did not contain the outcomes of interest. We did not pose any limitations regarding sample size or patient characteristics.
We utilized the R statistical software (V.4.3.1; R package meta) to conduct the analysis of all the data obtained. We calculated the OR for binary variables, and the corresponding 95% CI. To synthesize the data, random-effect models, as well as forest plots were generated to visually represent the synthesis of the data. Additionally, we assessed heterogeneity by using Cochran and tests. A value < .05 for the statistic or more than 50% suggests notable heterogeneity. Based on a small number of studies (<10), the assessment of publication bias could not be reliably performed.
This meta-analysis encompassed data from 4 studies. Patients with cICA-PO and AIS who underwent EVT ( = 135) exhibited lower rates of functional independence (OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.20-0.61; < .001) compared with patients with true occlusions ( = 103), as well as successful recanalization rates (OR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.74; = .004). In addition, the cICA-PO group experienced higher mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) compared with the group with true carotid occlusions (OR = 2.62; 95% CI, 0.21-7.24; and OR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.00-4.95; = .049, respectively).
Individual patient data were not available. Studies were a retrospective design and some of the studies had small sample sizes. The included studies in our meta-analysis did not exclude patients with tandem occlusions that might influence the results of the comparison.
Compared with patients with true carotid occlusion, the cICA-PO group with AIS undergoing EVT presented poor outcomes with lower functional independence and successful recanalization, as well as higher sICH and mortality rates.
对于伴有颈内动脉假性闭塞(cICA-PO)的急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者,有效治疗需要全面研究血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的安全性和结果。然而,可用数据有限,这突出表明需要进一步研究,以确保更好的治疗策略并提高这些患者的护理质量。
本研究旨在评估与真正颈动脉闭塞患者相比,该人群的治疗管理和结局。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,通过 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus 从数据库建立到 2023 年 11 月进行了全面的系统评价。
纳入研究的患者人数从 16 例到 146 例不等。通过 4 篇全文文章,共收集了 259 例患者。我们比较了 cICA-PO 患者与因 AIS 行 EVT 的真正颈动脉闭塞患者的结局。我们排除了那些仅包括颈动脉假性闭塞而无脑卒中患者的研究、综述文章、重复研究、包含另一项纳入研究中相同患者的重叠数据、病例报告、患者少于 5 例的病例系列以及未包含感兴趣结局的会议摘要。我们没有对样本量或患者特征施加任何限制。
我们使用 R 统计软件(V.4.3.1;R 包 meta)对所有获得的数据进行分析。我们计算了二项变量的 OR,并计算了相应的 95%CI。为了综合数据,我们生成了随机效应模型和森林图,以直观地表示数据的综合情况。此外,我们还使用 Cochran 和 检验评估了异质性。 统计量的值 <.05 或 超过 50%表明存在显著异质性。由于研究数量较少(<10),无法可靠地进行发表偏倚评估。
该荟萃分析纳入了 4 项研究的数据。接受 EVT 的伴有 cICA-PO 和 AIS 的患者( = 135)的功能独立性率较低(OR = 0.35;95%CI,0.20-0.61; <.001),与真正闭塞患者( = 103)相比,再通成功率也较低(OR = 0.39;95%CI,0.20-0.74; = .004)。此外,cICA-PO 组的死亡率和症状性颅内出血(sICH)发生率高于真正颈动脉闭塞组(OR = 2.62;95%CI,0.21-7.24;OR = 2.23;95%CI,1.00-4.95; =.049)。
无法获得个体患者数据。研究设计为回顾性,部分研究样本量较小。我们荟萃分析中的纳入研究并未排除可能影响比较结果的串联闭塞患者。
与真正颈动脉闭塞的 AIS 患者相比,接受 EVT 的伴有 cICA-PO 的患者结局较差,功能独立性和再通成功率较低,sICH 和死亡率较高。