Suppr超能文献

在针对常见呼吸道病原体进行测试时,对20微克左法莫林药敏纸片与肉汤微量稀释法的评估。

Assessment of lefamulin 20 µg disk versus broth microdilution when tested against common respiratory pathogens.

作者信息

Cao Ying, Zhu Jichao, Liang Bingshao, Guo Yan, Ding Li, Hu Fupin

机构信息

Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Clinical laboratory, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; Joint Laboratory of Hospital & Enterprise for Pathogen Diagnosis of Drug-resistant Bacterial Infections and Innovative Drug R&D, Shanghai, China.

Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Clinical laboratory, Huzhou Central Hospital, Fifth School of Clinical of Zhejiang Chinses Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Dec;64(6):107366. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107366. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.

METHODS

A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 Staphylococcus aureus, 211 Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 121 Haemophilus influenzae, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.

RESULTS

Lefamulin showed potent activity against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of S. aureus isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in S. aureus. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.

CONCLUSIONS

The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.

摘要

目的

评估与临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)法相比,20μg乐伐莫林纸片扩散试验的性能。

方法

2020年从中国抗菌监测网络的71个医疗中心分离出共572株临床菌株,包括240株金黄色葡萄球菌、211株肺炎链球菌和121株流感嗜血杆菌。按照CLSI进行BMD法和纸片扩散法检测。计算分类一致性(CA)、主要误差(ME)和非常见误差(VME)。

结果

乐伐莫林对金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌显示出强效活性。使用BMD法,乐伐莫林在0.25mg/L时抑制了97.1%的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株;7株分离株不敏感。对于肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌,乐伐莫林的敏感率为100%,本研究中未发现不敏感菌株。与参考BMD法相比,20μg乐伐莫林纸片试验的CA为99.8%(571/572),VME为14.3%(1/7),无ME。在我们的研究中,VME在金黄色葡萄球菌中确定。对于肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌,由于缺乏乐伐莫林不敏感菌株,未确定VME。

结论

对于金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎链球菌和流感嗜血杆菌,20μg乐伐莫林纸片扩散试验与参考BMD法显示出优异的CA和ME。VME超过CLSI建议可能是由于乐伐莫林不敏感分离株较少导致的偏差。我们的结果表明,通过纸片扩散法检测到的乐伐莫林不敏感分离株应由参考BMD法进行确认。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验