Suppr超能文献

比较不同栓塞材料对精索静脉曲张患者疼痛和生育结局的改善效果:一项系统评价。

Comparing the efficacy of different embolisation materials in improving pain and fertility outcomes in patients with varicoceles: A systematic review.

作者信息

Kasunic Daniel, Crebert Mitchell, Treacy Patrick-Julien, Steffens Daniel, Karunaratne Sascha, Waugh Richard, Thanigasalam Ruban, Leslie Scott

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Urology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 Feb;69(1):112-125. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13801. Epub 2024 Oct 27.

Abstract

Radiological embolisation has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to surgery for varicocele treatment. While systematic reviews have compared embolisation to surgery, attempts to compare different embolisation materials have been limited. The objective was to conduct a systematic review assessing the potential benefits of combining coils with sclerosants for varicocele embolisation on fertility, pain, recurrence and complication rates in male patients, as compared to using coils alone. The search was conducted through MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases from inception to May 2023. Comparative studies that reported male varicocele patients treated with embolisation using either coils or coils with sclerosants were included, with primary outcomes of either fertility, pain or recurrence. Pearling of reference lists was also performed to identify additional articles. Risk of bias for each study was assessed using the Downs and Black Checklist. Overall, 21 studies (2236 patients) were included. Patients were treated with coils in 14 studies, and nine studies used coils with sclerosants. An improvement in sperm concentration and motility was identified post-embolisation in most studies that reported these outcomes. Pregnancy and recurrence rates were comparable between the two materials. All four studies that reported pain outcomes following embolisation noted improvement in pain scores. Only one comparative study was included, for recurrence. This review has identified improvements in pain and fertility following varicocele embolisation. However, it could not be determined which material was superior due to the lack of high-quality comparative studies in the literature.

摘要

放射栓塞术已成为一种安全有效的精索静脉曲张治疗手术替代方案。虽然系统评价已对栓塞术与手术进行了比较,但比较不同栓塞材料的尝试却很有限。本研究的目的是进行一项系统评价,评估与单独使用线圈相比,在精索静脉曲张栓塞术中联合使用线圈和硬化剂对男性患者生育能力、疼痛、复发率和并发症发生率的潜在益处。检索从MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库建库至2023年5月。纳入了报告使用线圈或线圈与硬化剂进行栓塞治疗的男性精索静脉曲张患者的比较研究,主要结局为生育能力、疼痛或复发。还对参考文献列表进行了筛选以识别其他文章。使用唐斯和布莱克清单评估每项研究的偏倚风险。总体而言,纳入了21项研究(2236例患者)。14项研究中患者接受了线圈治疗,9项研究使用了线圈与硬化剂联合治疗。在大多数报告了这些结局的研究中,栓塞术后精子浓度和活力有所改善。两种材料的妊娠率和复发率相当。所有4项报告栓塞术后疼痛结局的研究均指出疼痛评分有所改善。仅纳入了1项关于复发的比较研究。本综述发现精索静脉曲张栓塞术后疼痛和生育能力有所改善。然而,由于文献中缺乏高质量的比较研究,无法确定哪种材料更优。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验