Suppr超能文献

[两种手术方法治疗老年膝骨关节炎患者股骨粗隆间骨折的比较]

[Comparison of two surgical methods for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis].

作者信息

Wan Qian, Wu Chun-Hu, Yin Hua-Dong, Zhu Xiao-Feng, Liu Yu, Yu You-Liang

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Zhejiang Armed Police Corps Hospital, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Oct 25;37(10):985-90. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20231214.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the difference in the effectiveness between proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) and proximal femoral locking compression plate(PFLCP) of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients combined with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 65 intertrochanteric femoral fractures combined with knee osteoarthritis between June 2015 and February 2021 were retrospectively analyze. They were divided into two groups according to the different surgical methods. PFNA group was composed of 36 patients, 12 males and 24 females, aged from 61to 88 years old with an average of (77.0±6.4)years old. There were 17 cases of left injury and 19 cases of right injury. According to modified Evans classification, there were 3 cases of typeⅡ, 19 cases of type Ⅲ, 10 cases of type Ⅳ, and 4 cases of type Ⅴ. PFLCP group was composed of 29 patients, 11 males and 18 females, aged from 60 to 92 years old with an average of (78.8±6.5) years old. There were 14 cases of left injury and 15 cases of right injury.According to modified Evans classification, there were 2 cases of typeⅡ, 18 cases of type Ⅲ, 7 cases of type Ⅳ, and 2 cases of type Ⅴ. Comparison of operation time, intraoperation blood loss, postoperative bed time, incidence of postoperative complications, Harris score at 6 months and 1 year postoperation.

RESULTS

All 65 patients were followed up ranging from 12 to 24 months with an average of (16.9±3.6) months. In the PFNA and PFLCP groups, the operation time was respectively (57.6±6.8) min and (77.4±6.5) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (128.3±50.3) ml and (156.3±23.9) ml, postoperative bed time was (4.0±2.5) days and (8.1±2.0) days, Harris score at 6 months postoperative was (45.3±8.6) points and (36.3±7.0) points. There were significant differences between two groups(<0.05). Incidence of postoperative complications was 19.4%(7/36)and 34.5%(10/29), Harris score at 1 year postoperative was (60.8±6.7) points and (59.0±8.1) points.There was no significant difference between the two groups(>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PFLCP, PFNA treatment of elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis between the femoral intertrochanteric fractures shorter surgical time, less intraoperative blood loss, bed rest after surgery, short-term hip function recovery better, when the affected knee joint can tolerate traction, can be used as a priority.

摘要

目的

探讨股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)与股骨近端锁定加压钢板(PFLCP)治疗老年股骨转子间骨折合并膝关节骨关节炎疗效的差异。

方法

回顾性分析2015年6月至2021年2月间65例股骨转子间骨折合并膝关节骨关节炎患者的临床资料。根据手术方式不同分为两组。PFNA组36例,男12例,女24例,年龄61~88岁,平均(77.0±6.4)岁。左侧损伤17例,右侧损伤19例。按改良Evans分型:Ⅱ型3例,Ⅲ型19例,Ⅳ型10例,Ⅴ型4例。PFLCP组29例,男11例,女18例,年龄60~92岁,平均(78.8±6.5)岁。左侧损伤14例,右侧损伤15例。按改良Evans分型:Ⅱ型2例,Ⅲ型18例,Ⅳ型7例,Ⅴ型2例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后卧床时间、术后并发症发生率、术后6个月及1年的Harris评分。

结果

65例患者均获随访,随访时间12~24个月,平均(16.9±3.6)个月。PFNA组与PFLCP组手术时间分别为(57.6±6.8)min和(77.4±6.5)min,术中出血量分别为(128.3±50.3)ml和(156.3±23.9)ml,术后卧床时间分别为(4.0±2.5)d和(8.1±2.0)d,术后6个月Harris评分分别为(45.3±8.6)分和(36.3±7.0)分。两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。术后并发症发生率分别为19.4%(7/36)和34.5%(10/29),术后1年Harris评分分别为(60. 8±6.7)分和(59.0±8.1)分。两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

与PFLCP相比,PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折合并膝关节骨关节炎手术时间短,术中出血量少,术后卧床时间短,短期髋关节功能恢复较好,当患膝关节能耐受牵引时,可优先选用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验