Jefferson Anneli
School of English, Communication and Philosophy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Oct 28:1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0963180124000367.
Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this refusal potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of "terminal anorexia" suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician-assisted suicide might be justified. The author argues that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is in conflict with the claim that individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for terminal anorexia have decision-making capacity. It should therefore be rejected.
当厌食症患者的拒绝治疗可能会导致致命后果时,他们是否应该能够拒绝治疗是一个棘手的话题。最近一项关于新增“终末期厌食症”类别的提议提出了一些标准,即在何种情况下转向姑息治疗甚至医生协助自杀可能是合理的。作者认为,这一提议的诊断通过将厌食症类比为身体疾病并强调饥饿的影响,给疾病轨迹带来了一种虚假的确定性。此外,这种概念化与符合终末期厌食症诊断标准的个体具有决策能力这一说法相冲突。因此,它应该被拒绝。