• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“阿姆尔体征”:一项评估一种新临床体征在急性阑尾炎诊断中诊断价值的病例对照研究

"Amr Sign": A Case-Control Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Value of a New Clinical Sign in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.

作者信息

Aboulwafa Amr Mohamed F, Aboulwafa Ali A, Ahmad Khalil, Abouzour Mazin, Khairallah Amira

机构信息

Surgery, Westbay Medicare Hospital, Doha, QAT.

Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar, Doha, QAT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70222. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.70222
PMID:39463628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11512662/
Abstract

Introduction Acute appendicitis, a prevalent cause of acute abdominal pain and a common indication for emergency surgery, presents a diagnostic challenge due to its diverse clinical presentation and variability in appendix location and symptoms. Traditional diagnostic approaches, including physical examination, clinical scoring systems, and imaging techniques, have limitations. This study introduces the "Amr sign," a new diagnostic indicator characterized by sudden reflex hyperextension of the neck upon palpation of the right iliac fossa, which is hypothesized to reflect local peritoneal irritation from an inflamed appendix. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study at Alwakra Hospital from November 2016 to January 2019 that included 195 patients aged 15 years and older with right iliac fossa pain and an Alvarado score of four or more. The "Amr sign" was evaluated alongside standard clinical examination and imaging results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed via histopathological confirmation, which is the gold standard. Results The "Amr sign" had a sensitivity of 68.6% and a specificity of 67.3%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 89%, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was 45%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.679 for the "Amr sign" compared with 0.622 for the other imaging modalities, suggesting comparable diagnostic performance. The "Amr sign" demonstrated a higher likelihood ratio of a positive test (2.3) and a lower likelihood ratio of a negative test (0.46). Conclusion The "Amr sign" is a promising diagnostic tool for acute appendicitis, offering a simple, reliable, and quick test that can be performed by less experienced physicians. While its sensitivity and specificity are moderate, its high PPV suggests that it is particularly useful in confirming appendicitis. Further research and validation are needed to fully establish its role in clinical practice.

摘要

引言

急性阑尾炎是急性腹痛的常见病因,也是急诊手术的常见指征,因其临床表现多样、阑尾位置及症状存在变异性,故诊断颇具挑战性。包括体格检查、临床评分系统及影像学技术在内的传统诊断方法均有局限性。本研究引入了“阿姆尔征”,这是一种新的诊断指标,其特征为触诊右髂窝时颈部突然反射性过伸,据推测这反映了发炎阑尾引起的局部腹膜刺激。

方法

我们于2016年11月至2019年1月在阿尔瓦克拉医院开展了一项前瞻性观察性研究,纳入了195例年龄在15岁及以上、有右髂窝疼痛且阿尔瓦拉多评分在4分及以上的患者。对“阿姆尔征”与标准临床检查及影像学结果进行了评估。通过组织病理学确诊(这是金标准)来评估诊断准确性。

结果

“阿姆尔征”的敏感性为68.6%,特异性为67.3%。阳性预测值(PPV)为89%,而阴性预测值(NPV)为45%。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示,“阿姆尔征”的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.679,其他影像学检查方法的AUC为0.622,提示二者诊断性能相当。“阿姆尔征”的阳性试验似然比更高(2.3),阴性试验似然比更低(0.46)。

结论

“阿姆尔征”是一种有前景的急性阑尾炎诊断工具,提供了一种简单、可靠且快速的检查方法,经验不足的医生也可操作。虽然其敏感性和特异性中等,但其较高的PPV表明它在确诊阑尾炎方面特别有用。需要进一步的研究和验证来全面确立其在临床实践中的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868f/11512662/bc92ecfb32d3/cureus-0016-00000070222-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868f/11512662/f24d873a4f75/cureus-0016-00000070222-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868f/11512662/bc92ecfb32d3/cureus-0016-00000070222-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868f/11512662/f24d873a4f75/cureus-0016-00000070222-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/868f/11512662/bc92ecfb32d3/cureus-0016-00000070222-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
"Amr Sign": A Case-Control Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Value of a New Clinical Sign in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.“阿姆尔体征”:一项评估一种新临床体征在急性阑尾炎诊断中诊断价值的病例对照研究
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70222. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
3
Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of modified RIPASA and MASS in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in Suez Canal University Hospital Emergency Department: a cross-sectional study.比较改良 RIPASA 和 MASS 在苏伊士运河大学医院急诊科诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者中的诊断准确性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 8;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00677-7.
4
Alvarado or RIPASA? Which one do you use to diagnose acute appendicitis?: A cross-sectional study.阿尔瓦拉多评分还是RIPASA评分?你用哪一个来诊断急性阑尾炎?:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;6(1):e1078. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1078. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alvarado Score and Abdominal Ultrasound for Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.评估阿尔瓦拉多评分和腹部超声对急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性:一项回顾性单中心研究
Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 6;16:159-166. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S462013. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluation Of Modified Alvarado, Ripasa And Lintula Scoring System As Diagnostic Tools For Acute Appendicitis.改良阿尔瓦拉多、里帕萨和林图拉评分系统作为急性阑尾炎诊断工具的评估
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):46-50.
7
Evaluating appendicitis scoring systems using a prospective pediatric cohort.使用前瞻性儿科队列评估阑尾炎评分系统。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;49(6):778-84, 784.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.12.016. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
8
Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis.改良阿瓦拉多评分系统和RIPASA评分系统作为急性阑尾炎诊断工具的评估
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(4):276-280. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.005.
9
Assessment of the Diagnostic Reliability of Modified Alvarado Scores and Abdominal Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis.改良阿瓦拉多评分及腹部超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断可靠性的评估
Cureus. 2023 May 14;15(5):e38991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38991. eCollection 2023 May.
10
[Role of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Jan 22;29:56. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.56.14011. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of modified Alvarado score combined with ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective analytical study.改良阿尔瓦拉多评分联合超声在急性阑尾炎诊断中的效能:一项前瞻性分析研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Mar 12;86(5):2586-2590. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001932. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Diagnostic pathways in acute appendicitis: Clinical score plus ultrasound outperform CT scan or upfront surgery, especially in doubtful cases.急性阑尾炎的诊断途径:临床评分加超声优于 CT 扫描或直接手术,尤其是在可疑病例中。
World J Surg. 2024 Jun;48(6):1350-1359. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12160. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
3
Assessment of the Diagnostic Reliability of Modified Alvarado Scores and Abdominal Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis.
改良阿瓦拉多评分及腹部超声检查在急性阑尾炎诊断可靠性的评估
Cureus. 2023 May 14;15(5):e38991. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38991. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Predictive value of sphericity index and other multidetector computed tomography findings in perforated acute appendicitis.球体指数及多排螺旋 CT 其他发现对穿孔性急性阑尾炎的预测价值。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 May;29(5):590-595. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.45383.
5
The Value of the Alvarado Score for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Alvarado 评分对儿童急性阑尾炎诊断价值的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Oct;58(10):1886-1892. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.02.060. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Does CT Reduce the Rate of Negative Laparoscopies for Acute Appendicitis? A Single-Center Retrospective Study.CT能否降低急性阑尾炎阴性腹腔镜检查率?一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Med Life. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):26-31. doi: 10.25122/jml-2019-0099.
7
A one year prospective study to compare and evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified Alvarado score and ultrasonography in acute appendicitis, in adults.一项为期一年的前瞻性研究,旨在比较和评估改良阿尔瓦拉多评分和超声检查对成人急性阑尾炎的诊断准确性。
Indian J Surg. 2008 Jun;70(3):125-9. doi: 10.1007/s12262-008-0035-7. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
8
Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993-2008.美国急性阑尾炎的流行病学变化:研究期间为 1993 年至 2008 年。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jun 15;175(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.017. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
Epidemiology of appendectomy and appendicitis in the Valencian community (Spain), 1998-2007.1998-2007 年西班牙巴伦西亚地区阑尾切除术和阑尾炎的流行病学研究。
Dig Surg. 2009;26(5):406-12. doi: 10.1159/000235956. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
10
Changes in the epidemiology of acute appendicitis and appendectomy in Danish children 1996-2004.1996 - 2004年丹麦儿童急性阑尾炎及阑尾切除术的流行病学变化
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;19(5):286-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224199. Epub 2009 Jun 22.