Zhang Xu, Zhang Ning, Song Haicheng, Ren Yueyi
Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Qingdao, China.
Women's and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1386129. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1386129. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to determine the 50% effective dose (ED50) of ciprofol when combined with different doses of remifentanil for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy of school-age children and to evaluate its safety.
This study involved school-aged children who were scheduled to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under deep sedation. The children were randomly assigned to two groups: remifentanil 0.3 μg/kg (R0.3) and remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg (R0.5). Anesthesia was induced with remifentanil, followed by ciprofol. The dose of ciprofol for each patient was determined using the Dixon up-down sequential method. If the MOAA/S score was ≤1 and the child did not exhibit significant movement or coughing during the endoscopy process, sedation was considered successful. The first patient in each group received 0.5 mg/kg ciprofol. The dose of ciprofol was adjusted by 0.05 mg/kg based on the response of the previous patient. The primary outcome was the ED50 of the ciprofol-induction dose. The total ciprofol doses, onset times, awakening times, and adverse reactions were recorded.
This study explored the ED50 of ciprofol combined with different doses of remifentanil for successful sedation in upper gastrointestinal examinations in school-aged children. Compared to the use of remifentanil 0.3 μg/kg, the combination of ciprofol with remifentanil 0.5 μg/kg significantly reduced the ED50 required to prevent body movement or cough during endoscope insertion but increased the incidence of respiratory depression.
本研究旨在确定丙泊酚与不同剂量瑞芬太尼联合用于学龄儿童上消化道内镜检查时的半数有效剂量(ED50),并评估其安全性。
本研究纳入计划在深度镇静下接受上消化道内镜检查的学龄儿童。将儿童随机分为两组:瑞芬太尼0.3μg/kg(R0.3)组和瑞芬太尼0.5μg/kg(R0.5)组。先使用瑞芬太尼诱导麻醉,随后给予丙泊酚。采用Dixon上下序贯法确定每位患者的丙泊酚剂量。如果改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S)≤1且儿童在内镜检查过程中未出现明显运动或咳嗽,则认为镇静成功。每组的第一名患者接受0.5mg/kg丙泊酚。根据前一名患者的反应,丙泊酚剂量以0.05mg/kg进行调整。主要结局是丙泊酚诱导剂量的ED50。记录丙泊酚总剂量、起效时间、苏醒时间和不良反应。
1)采用Dixon法收集每组的交叉数据,计算得出R0.3组和R0.5组的ED50值分别为0.390mg/kg(95%CI 0.356 - 0.424mg/kg)和0.332mg/kg(95%CI 0.291 - 0.374mg/kg)。R0.3组丙泊酚的ED50显著高于R0.5组(<0.05)。2)R0.5组的起效时间和恢复时间短于R0.3组(<0.05)。两组比较时,R0.5组丙泊酚的总剂量降低(<0.05)。3)与R0.3组相比,R0.5组诱导期呼吸抑制的发生率增加(<0.05)。
本研究探讨了丙泊酚与不同剂量瑞芬太尼联合用于学龄儿童上消化道检查成功镇静的ED50。与使用0.3μg/kg瑞芬太尼相比,丙泊酚与0.5μg/kg瑞芬太尼联合使用显著降低了内镜插入过程中预防身体运动或咳嗽所需的ED50,但增加了呼吸抑制的发生率。