Suppr超能文献

社交媒体内容分析在营养保健品和青光眼领域的应用。

Social media content analysis for nutraceuticals and glaucoma.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Rom J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul-Sep;68(3):258-267. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2024.48.

Abstract

AIM

Google and various social media platforms have content on the therapeutic potential of nutritional supplements for glaucoma, but whether that information is evidence-based has not been analyzed. The current study explores such content for its quality.

METHODOLOGY

Criteria of search used were "glaucoma" and "vitamins" or "nutraceuticals" or "nutritional supplements". The first 30 search results on Google for every keyword combination were determined. The top 30 video results on Facebook Watch and YouTube for each keyword combination were selected. The initial 30 posts from Reddit and the top 30 Images on Google Images related to the keyword combination were also examined.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight websites on Google, 75 Images from Google, 39 YouTube videos, 12 video results from Facebook Watch, and 19 posts from Reddit were identified and assessed for quality.The average Sandvik scores were 10.86 ± 2.6 (Google webpages), 10.08 ± 1.9 (YouTube videos), 10.62 ± 1.6 (Facebook Watch), and 10.26 ± 2.8 (Posts from Reddit). The average Risk Scores were 0.67 ± 0.9 (videos from YouTube), 0.49 ± 0.8 (webpages on Google), 0.33 ± 0.5 (videos from Facebook Watch), and 0.26 ± 0.5 (Reddit). The mean HON code scores were 5.15 ± 1.5 (YouTube), 6 ± 1.7 (Google webpages), 4.42 ± 1.1 (Facebook Watch), and 3.47 ± 1.8 (Reddit).

DISCUSSION

Many patients who seek information online do not consult their physicians to verify the accuracy of their search results. Thus, with this changing trend, video and online medical content analysis has attracted interest. Search engines and social media platforms may serve as adjuncts for patient counseling in current care models by providing an online educational community. Compared to non-healthcare professionals, the healthcare professionals' information regarding nutraceuticals/nutritional supplements in glaucoma is of higher quality. Most HCPs do not recommend the use of dietary supplements as a complementary treatment for glaucoma, either because of inconclusive/insufficient data or due to contrasting studies that contradict each other. However, literature is building up with each passing day, to support nutritional supplementation as an integrative IOP-independent strategy for glaucoma management.

CONCLUSION

The information provided by healthcare professionals is superior to that offered by non-healthcare professionals. Most HCPs advise against the use of nutritional supplements as an adjunct therapy for glaucoma, either because of inconclusive data or due to contrasting studies that contradict each other.

摘要

目的

谷歌和各种社交媒体平台上都有关于营养补充剂治疗青光眼潜力的内容,但这些信息是否基于证据尚未分析。本研究旨在探讨此类内容的质量。

方法

使用的搜索标准为“青光眼”和“维生素”或“营养保健品”或“营养补充剂”。确定每个关键词组合的谷歌前 30 个搜索结果。选择每个关键词组合在 Facebook Watch 和 YouTube 上的前 30 个视频结果。还检查了 Reddit 上的前 30 个帖子和与关键词组合相关的 Google 图片上的前 30 个图片。

结果

确定并评估了谷歌上的 68 个网站、谷歌上的 75 个图片、YouTube 上的 39 个视频、Facebook Watch 上的 12 个视频结果和 Reddit 上的 19 个帖子的质量。桑德维克评分的平均值分别为谷歌网页 10.86 ± 2.6、YouTube 视频 10.08 ± 1.9、Facebook Watch 视频 10.62 ± 1.6 和 Reddit 帖子 10.26 ± 2.8。风险评分的平均值分别为 YouTube 视频 0.67 ± 0.9、谷歌网页 0.49 ± 0.8、Facebook Watch 视频 0.33 ± 0.5 和 Reddit 帖子 0.26 ± 0.5。HON 代码评分的平均值分别为 YouTube 5.15 ± 1.5、谷歌网页 6 ± 1.7、Facebook Watch 4.42 ± 1.1 和 Reddit 3.47 ± 1.8。

讨论

许多在线搜索信息的患者不会咨询医生以验证其搜索结果的准确性。因此,随着这种趋势的变化,视频和在线医疗内容分析引起了人们的兴趣。搜索引擎和社交媒体平台可以通过提供在线教育社区,为当前护理模式中的患者咨询提供辅助。与非医疗保健专业人员相比,医疗保健专业人员提供的关于青光眼营养保健品的信息质量更高。大多数 HCP 不建议将膳食补充剂作为青光眼的辅助治疗方法,这要么是因为数据不确定/不足,要么是因为相互矛盾的对照研究。然而,随着时间的推移,文献不断增加,支持将营养补充作为一种与眼压无关的青光眼管理综合策略。

结论

医疗保健专业人员提供的信息优于非医疗保健专业人员提供的信息。大多数 HCP 不建议将营养补充剂作为青光眼的辅助治疗方法,要么是因为数据不确定/不足,要么是因为相互矛盾的对照研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b77f/11503235/1a8f789cc4fc/RomJOphthalmol-68-258-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验