Nikkels Charlotte, Vestering Asra, Huirne Judith A F, de Leeuw Robert A, van Mello Norah M, Groenman Freek A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Int J Transgend Health. 2023 Nov 17;25(4):878-887. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2023.2278737. eCollection 2024.
Colpectomy entails the surgical removal of the vaginal epithelium. It may be performed in trans-masculine individuals as gender-affirming surgery. Vaginal colpectomy is a complex procedure with potentially severe complications. As alternative, robotic-assisted laparoscopic colpectomy combined with robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and possible bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RAC+) can be performed. To compare surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted colpectomy combined with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with a vaginal colpectomy after previous hysterectomy in trans masculine patients. A single-center retrospective cohort study included 310 transgender men who underwent either robotic-assisted colpectomy combined with a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RAC+) ( = 140) or vaginal colpectomy ( = 170) between January 2006 and December 2019. Surgical details and clinical outcomes were collected from all patients. The median intra-operative blood loss was 100 mL (50-200) in RAC + and 300 mL (200-450) in vaginal colpectomy ( < 0.01). The median duration of hospital stay was 2 days (1-2) in the RAC + group and 3 days (2-4) in the vaginal group ( < 0.01). In the RAC + group 63 (45%) peri-operative complications were reported, compared to 93 (54.7%) in the vaginal group [OR 0.7 (0.4-1.1)]. The main difference was found in intra-operative complications (RAC+ 0.7% vaginal 10.6%). Furthermore, the total number of complications graded 3a and higher was significantly lower in the RAC + group [OR 0.3 (0.2-0.7)]. Although RAC + entailed a more extensive procedure, compared to vaginal colpectomy, RAC + had a lower risk of severe peri-operative complications, requiring re-intervention; intra-operative blood loss was lower and hospital stay shorter. Both routes of colpectomy are complex procedures with potentially severe complications. Future studies are needed to study whether robot-colpectomy could be a safe alternative to vaginal colpectomy in patients with a previous hysterectomy.
阴道切除术需要手术切除阴道上皮。在跨性别男性个体中,它可作为性别确认手术进行。阴道切除术是一个复杂的手术,可能会出现严重并发症。作为替代方案,可以进行机器人辅助腹腔镜阴道切除术,联合机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术以及可能的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(RAC+)。为了比较跨性别男性患者先前子宫切除术后,机器人辅助阴道切除术联合子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与阴道切除术的手术效果。一项单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了310名跨性别男性,他们在2006年1月至2019年12月期间接受了机器人辅助阴道切除术联合子宫切除术和双侧输卵管卵巢切除术(RAC+)(n = 140)或阴道切除术(n = 170)。收集了所有患者的手术细节和临床结果。RAC+组术中中位失血量为100 mL(50 - 200),阴道切除术组为300 mL(200 - 450)(P < 0.01)。RAC+组中位住院时间为2天(1 - 2),阴道切除术组为3天(2 - 4)(P < 0.01)。RAC+组报告了63例(45%)围手术期并发症,而阴道切除术组为93例(54.7%)[比值比0.7(0.4 - 1.1)]。主要差异在于术中并发症(RAC+ 0.7%,阴道切除术10.6%)。此外,RAC+组3a级及以上并发症的总数显著更低[比值比0.3(0.2 - 0.7)]。尽管与阴道切除术相比,RAC+涉及更广泛的手术过程,但RAC+围手术期严重并发症的风险更低,无需再次干预;术中失血量更少,住院时间更短。两种阴道切除途径都是复杂的手术,可能会出现严重并发症。未来需要研究对于先前已行子宫切除术的患者,机器人辅助阴道切除术是否可以作为阴道切除术的安全替代方案。