Department of Orthopedics, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Orthopedics, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39900. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039900.
Our study aimed to evaluate and compare the changes in ulnar nerve tension and strain at different elbow positions radiologically and mechanically before and after applying the medial K-wire on the supracondylar humerus fracture cadaver model. We used ten fresh frozen cadaver upper extremity specimens to measure strain and tension on the ulnar nerve in 3 different elbow positions: elbow full extension, elbow flexion-forearm supination, and elbow flexion-forearm pronation. We employed Shear wave elastography (Siemens Acuson S3000 USG, 9L4 linear probe) and a microstrain gauge (Microstrain, Inc., Burlington) to obtain our measurements. Minimum, maximum and mean stress and strain values on the nerve and its surroundings were measured and compared statistically. The mean values of elbows with full extension are statistically lower than those in elbows with 90° flexion-forearm supination and those with 90° flexion-forearm pronation positions. Statistical evaluations were performed between all of the groups. Elbow 90° flexion-forearm pronation, both minimum and maximum and mean values were statistically higher in the group, including the specimens with Kirschner applied. The mean values in the elbow full extension and elbow 90° flexion-forearm supination positions were statistically similar in the specimens with and without the K-wire applied. Despite the numerous techniques described in the literature, there is no absolute technical method to prevent ulnar nerve damage. K-wire application to the medial epicondyle with the elbow in a slightly extended position is a technique that can be applied to reduce the risk of ulnar nerve paralysis. However, it has been reported that ulnar nerve damage can be observed in cases where a splint is placed in the 90° flexion position. We hypothesize that the position of the elbow joint in the postoperative period may contribute to ulnar nerve paralysis due to soft tissue tension and strain and as a result of changing the balance of the surrounding tissues. Our findings suggest that the long arm splint applied in elbow 90° flexion and forearm pronation position should not be preferred in the postoperative period. The maximum strain values obtained in the elbow full extension were lower, suggesting that it would be appropriate to stabilize the elbow in the extension position as much as possible postoperatively. Level of evidence: Level V.
我们的研究旨在评估和比较应用内侧克氏针固定肱骨髁上骨折尸体模型前后不同肘位下尺神经张力和应变的影像学和力学变化。我们使用 10 个新鲜冷冻的上肢标本在 3 种不同的肘部位置测量尺神经的应变和张力:肘部完全伸展、肘部弯曲-前臂旋前和肘部弯曲-前臂旋后。我们使用剪切波弹性成像(西门子 Acuson S3000 USG,9L4 线性探头)和微应变计(Microstrain,Inc.,Burlington)获得测量值。测量并比较神经及其周围的最小、最大和平均应力量值。肘部完全伸展的平均值明显低于 90° 肘屈-前臂旋前和 90° 肘屈-前臂旋后的位置。对所有组进行统计学评估。肘部 90° 肘屈-前臂旋后,包括应用克氏针的标本,最小、最大和平均应变值均较高。应用和不应用克氏针的标本在肘部完全伸展和 90° 肘屈-前臂旋前位置的平均值相似。尽管文献中有许多技术描述,但没有绝对的技术方法可以预防尺神经损伤。应用克氏针固定内侧上髁,使肘部轻微伸展,是一种可以降低尺神经瘫痪风险的技术。然而,据报道,在放置夹板在 90° 弯曲位置时,可能会观察到尺神经损伤。我们假设关节在术后的位置可能会导致尺神经麻痹,这是由于软组织张力和应变以及周围组织平衡的变化所致。我们的研究结果表明,在术后期间,不应在肘部 90° 弯曲和前臂旋前位置应用长臂夹板。肘部完全伸展时获得的最大应变值较低,这表明术后尽可能保持肘部伸展位置是合适的。证据水平:5 级。