• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翼管神经切断术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Vidian Neurectomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kim Ji-Sun, Stybayeva Gulnaz, Hwang Se H

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;172(3):787-797. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1037. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1002/ohn.1037
PMID:39467055
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of vidian neurectomy (VN) or posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) combined with endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of six databases (PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) was conducted to identify relevant studies up to May 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

The effects of combining VN or PNN with ESS were evaluated in comparison to ESS alone. Outcomes were assessed by evaluating changes in Lund-Kennedy score, patient-reported symptom scores (VAS), quality of life, as well as adverse effects and recurrence rate of CRSwNP.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies, comprising 407 patients, were included in the analysis. The neurectomy group showed significant improvements in Lund-Kennedy score (SMD = 0.7276 [0.5695; 0.8857]), with statistically significant improvements maintained at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The treatment group maintained better improvements in sinusitis-related quality of life (SMD = 0.4540 [0.1784; 0.7297]) and VAS (SMD = 0.7096 [0.4356; 0.9837]) until 12 months postoperatively, but not at 24 months. Regarding adverse effects, additional neurectomy did not significantly induce epistaxis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9806 [0.2348; 4.0960]) or dry eye (OR = 2.4194 [0.1114; 52.5255]) compared to the control group. On the other hand, there was no difference in the recurrence rate of CRSwNP between the 2 groups during the follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION

Additional neurectomy shows better efficacy in improving endoscopic findings and symptoms in patients with CRSwNP and appears to be a safe and effective treatment.

摘要

目的

评估翼管神经切断术(VN)或鼻后神经切断术(PNN)联合鼻内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者的临床疗效。

资料来源

对六个数据库(PubMed、SCOPUS、Embase、Web of Science、谷歌学术和Cochrane)进行系统检索,以识别截至2024年5月的相关研究。

综述方法

将VN或PNN与ESS联合应用的效果与单纯ESS进行比较评估。通过评估Lund-Kennedy评分、患者报告的症状评分(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、生活质量的变化,以及CRSwNP的不良反应和复发率来评估结果。

结果

共有6项研究,包括407例患者,纳入分析。神经切断术组的Lund-Kennedy评分有显著改善(标准化均数差[SMD]=0.7276[0.5695;0.8857]),术后6、12和24个月维持有统计学意义的显著改善。治疗组在术后12个月内鼻窦炎相关生活质量(SMD=0.4540[0.1784;0.7297])和VAS(SMD=0.7096[0.4356;0.9837])方面维持更好的改善,但在24个月时未维持。关于不良反应,与对照组相比,额外的神经切断术并未显著诱发鼻出血(比值比[OR]=0.9806[0.2348;4.0960])或干眼(OR=2.4194[0.1114;52.5255])。另一方面,两组在随访期间CRSwNP的复发率没有差异。

结论

额外的神经切断术在改善CRSwNP患者的内镜检查结果和症状方面显示出更好的疗效,似乎是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Vidian Neurectomy in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.翼管神经切断术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Mar;172(3):787-797. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1037. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Endoscopic vidian and vidian-branch neurectomy for refractory allergic rhinitis: A systematic review.内镜下翼管神经及翼管神经分支切除术治疗难治性变应性鼻炎:一项系统评价
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2024 Mar;14(3):679-694. doi: 10.1002/alr.23259. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
3
Efficacy of vidian neurectomy in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps combined with allergic rhinitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.翼管神经切断术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉合并变应性鼻炎的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2025 Feb;52(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2024.12.004. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
4
Short-course oral steroids alone for chronic rhinosinusitis.短期口服类固醇单独用于慢性鼻窦炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011991.pub2.
5
Systemic and topical antibiotics for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的全身及局部用抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011994.pub2.
6
Equivalent healthcare resource use following either a long-acting steroid-eluting implant or repeat endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyp recurrence: a real-world evidence study.长效类固醇洗脱植入物或重复内镜手术治疗鼻息肉复发的慢性鼻窦炎患者后的等效医疗资源使用情况:一项真实世界证据研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2025 May;41(5):767-777. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2025.2513955. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
7
Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis.鼻内用类固醇与安慰剂或不干预治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011996.pub2.
8
Oral and intranasal aspirin desensitisation for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease.用于非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)诱发的呼吸道疾病的口服和鼻内阿司匹林脱敏疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 7;1(1):CD013476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013476.pub2.
9
Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis.用于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的不同类型鼻内类固醇
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011993.pub2.
10
Topical and systemic antifungal therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的局部和全身抗真菌治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;9(9):CD012453. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012453.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Additional (Selective) Vidian Neurectomy in Treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyp: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.额外(选择性)翼管神经切断术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2025 Apr 29:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000546116.