• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别特异性低流量阈值在评估一致和不一致分级主动脉瓣狭窄预后中的影响

Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.

作者信息

Bahlmann Edda, Gerdts Eva, Einarsen Eigir, Midtbø Helga, Pedersen Eva R, Rossebø Anne, Willems Stephan, Cramariuc Dana

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Clinic St. Georg, Lohmühlenstrasse 5, Hamburg 20099, Germany.

Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):280-286. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae272.

DOI:10.1093/ehjci/jeae272
PMID:39467305
Abstract

AIMS

Sex-specific low flow was recently defined as stroke volume index (SVi) ≤ 40 mL/m² in men and ≤32 mL/m² in women. We tested the prognostic association of these cut-offs in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) with concordantly and discordantly graded AS [concordantly graded AS by energy loss (CGASEL) and discordantly graded AS by energy loss (DGASEL)] based on pressure recovery adjusted aortic valve area [energy loss (EL)].

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 1351 patients with asymptomatic AS, peak jet velocity <4 m/s, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction enrolled in the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis study were used. DGASEL was defined as EL <1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg and CGASEL as EL ≥1.0 cm² with mean aortic gradient <40 mmHg. Patients were further grouped into normal and low flow. The outcome was combined all-cause death and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). CGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 915/253 patients, and DGASEL with normal/low flow was present in 57/126 patients. During a median follow-up of 4.3 years, event-free survival was lower in patients with DGASEL irrespective of flow compared to CGASEL with normal flow (P < 0.05). In Cox regression analysis, DGASEL with normal or low flow were both associated with increased risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for HF after adjustment for age, sex, heart rate, randomized study treatment, hypertension, aortic valve replacement, and aortic valve calcification (P < 0.05). No survival difference was found between patients with normal vs. low flow within groups of DGASEL or CGASEL.

CONCLUSION

Identification of low flow by the proposed sex-specific thresholds of SVi needs more prognostic validation before application in clinical practice.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00092677.

摘要

目的

性别特异性低流量最近被定义为男性每平方米体表面积的每搏输出量指数(SVi)≤40 mL/m²,女性≤32 mL/m²。我们基于压力恢复调整后的主动脉瓣面积[能量损失(EL)],测试了这些临界值在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中与能量损失分级一致和不一致的AS患者[能量损失分级一致的AS(CGASEL)和能量损失分级不一致的AS(DGASEL)]中的预后相关性。

方法和结果

使用了在主动脉瓣狭窄研究中纳入的1351例无症状AS、峰值射流速度<4 m/s且左心室射血分数保留的患者的数据。DGASEL被定义为EL<1.0 cm²且平均主动脉瓣压差<40 mmHg,CGASEL被定义为EL≥1.0 cm²且平均主动脉瓣压差<40 mmHg。患者进一步分为正常流量和低流量组。结局为全因死亡和心力衰竭(HF)住院的综合情况。915/253例患者存在正常/低流量的CGASEL,57/126例患者存在正常/低流量的DGASEL。在中位随访4.3年期间,与正常流量的CGASEL相比,无论流量如何,DGASEL患者的无事件生存率均较低(P<0.05)。在Cox回归分析中,调整年龄、性别、心率、随机研究治疗、高血压、主动脉瓣置换和主动脉瓣钙化后,正常或低流量的DGASEL均与全因死亡和HF住院风险增加相关(P<0.05)。在DGASEL或CGASEL组中,正常流量与低流量患者之间未发现生存差异。

结论

在临床实践中应用之前,通过提议的性别特异性SVi阈值识别低流量需要更多的预后验证。

临床试验注册编号

NCT00092677。

相似文献

1
Impact of sex-specific thresholds for low flow in assessment of prognosis in concordantly and discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis.性别特异性低流量阈值在评估一致和不一致分级主动脉瓣狭窄预后中的影响
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jan 31;26(2):280-286. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae272.
2
Integration of Flow-Gradient Patterns Into Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Suspected Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved LVEF: A Systematic Review of Evidence and Meta-Analysis.血流储备分数与梯度在左心室射血分数保留的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者临床决策中的整合:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;9(11):1255-1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
4
Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.低梯度重度主动脉瓣狭窄:来自CURRENT AS注册研究-2的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb 24;18(4):471-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.044. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
5
Prognosis in asymptomatic patients with discordantly graded aortic valve stenosis based on pressure recovery adjusted valve area.基于压力恢复校正的瓣口面积评估主动脉瓣狭窄程度不一致的无症状患者的预后。
Open Heart. 2022 Nov;9(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002159.
6
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
7
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
8
Pulse pressure and aortic valve peak velocity and incident heart failure after myocardial infarction: a cohort study.脉压、主动脉瓣峰值速度与心肌梗死后心力衰竭的发生:一项队列研究
Heart. 2025 Mar 26;111(8):370-377. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324517.
9
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Systolic Heart Failure and Moderate Aortic Stenosis: TAVR UNLOAD.收缩性心力衰竭合并中度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:TAVR UNLOAD研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Mar 11;85(9):878-890. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.10.070. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.