Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Dec 25;143(Pt 2):113400. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113400. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Studies on the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) prior to liver transplantation (LT) are still limited to case reports or case series. It is vital to be aware of possible risk of transplant rejection with regards to ICIs after LT.
To explore the possible risk of transplant rejection induced by ICIs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and investigate the safe washout interval between ICIs administration and LT.
HCC patients from 3 tertiary hospitals in China who received ICIs prior to LT over the past 5 years were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had experienced transplant rejection were reported in detail. Additionally, a comprehensive search of databases was conducted to identify case reports of HCC patients who underwent LT after receiving ICIs until October 1, 2024.
In our study, a total of 25 patients were analyzed. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors were most commonly used (68 %, 17/25). The median interval between the last dose of ICIs and LT was 64 (40-150.75) days. Three patients (12 %) experienced T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), 1 of which was induced by ICIs, and the other 2 of which could not be excluded from the influence of immunosuppressant concentrations. In literature review, a total of 96 cases of HCC patients who had received ICIs prior to LT were included. PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy resulted in significantly higher rejection than PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy and other ICIs combination regimens (P = 0.021). In patients with pembrolizumab, the interval from ICIs to LT was shorter in the rejection group than in the non-rejection group (P = 0.045). Twenty-one cases (21.88 %) experienced transplant rejection, and 3 patients passed away following transplant rejection.
ICIs prior to LT was associated with the risk of transplant rejection, especially with factors such as the type of ICIs and the interval between ICIs and LT. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to further explore the safety of ICIs.
在肝移植(LT)前使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的安全性研究仍然局限于病例报告或病例系列。了解 LT 后 ICI 引起移植排斥反应的可能风险至关重要。
探讨 ICI 在肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中引起移植排斥反应的可能性,并研究 ICI 给药与 LT 之间的安全冲洗间隔。
回顾性分析了过去 5 年来在中国 3 家三级医院接受 LT 前接受 ICI 的 HCC 患者。详细报告了发生移植排斥反应的患者。此外,还对数据库进行了全面搜索,以确定截至 2024 年 10 月 1 日接受 ICI 后接受 LT 的 HCC 患者的病例报告。
在我们的研究中,共分析了 25 例患者。程序性细胞死亡蛋白 1(PD-1)抑制剂的使用最为常见(68%,17/25)。ICI 最后一次给药与 LT 之间的中位间隔为 64(40-150.75)天。3 名患者(12%)发生 T 细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR),其中 1 例由 ICI 引起,另外 2 例不能排除免疫抑制剂浓度的影响。在文献复习中,共纳入了 96 例接受 LT 前接受 ICI 的 HCC 患者。PD-1 抑制剂单药治疗的排斥反应发生率明显高于 PD-L1 抑制剂单药治疗和其他 ICI 联合方案(P=0.021)。在接受 pembrolizumab 的患者中,ICI 至 LT 的间隔时间在排斥反应组比非排斥反应组更短(P=0.045)。21 例(21.88%)发生移植排斥反应,3 例患者在移植排斥反应后死亡。
LT 前使用 ICI 与移植排斥反应的风险相关,尤其是与 ICI 的类型和 ICI 与 LT 之间的间隔有关。需要多中心前瞻性研究进一步探讨 ICI 的安全性。