Cummins Emily R, Walley Alexander Y, Xuan Ziming, Yan Shapei, Schoenberger Samantha F, Formica Scott W, Bagley Sarah M, Beletsky Leo, Green Traci C, Lambert Audrey, Carroll Jennifer J
Ariadne Labs, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Grayken Center for Addiction, Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Addiction. 2025 Feb;120(2):327-334. doi: 10.1111/add.16690. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) is a legal process by which people are compulsorily admitted to substance use treatment. This study explored views about and promotion of ICC procedures for substance use disorders among public health-public safety post-overdose outreach programs and their outreach team members in Massachusetts, USA.
In this mixed-methods study, survey data were collected from post-overdose outreach programs in 2019, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with outreach team members in 2019 and 2020.
Massachusetts, USA.
We received 138 survey responses and conducted 38 interviews with post-overdose outreach team members (law enforcement officers, recovery coaches, social workers and harm reductionists) who were majority male (57%) and white (66%).
We used the survey instrument to categorize programs as more (discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters) or less ICC focused (discussed ICC at less than 50% of outreach encounters) and to identify program characteristics that corresponded with each categorization. Semi-structured interviews explored staff perceptions of ICC effectiveness.
Among 138 programs, 36% (n = 50) discussed ICC at 50% or more of outreach encounters. Discussing ICC at a majority of visits was positively associated with abstinence-only program philosophies (36% v. 6%, P < 0.001) and collaborating with drug courts (60% v. 30%, P < 0.001), but negatively associated with naloxone distribution (48% v. 75%, P < 0.001) and referring to syringe service programs (26% v. 65%, P < 0.001). Qualitative interviews identified three themes: 1) some programs viewed ICC as a first line tool to engage overdose survivors in treatment; 2) other programs considered ICC a last resort, skeptical of its benefits and concerned about potential harms; 3) families commonly initiated discussions about ICC, reportedly out of desperation.
Promotion of involuntary civil commitment (ICC) appears to vary widely across post-overdose outreach programs in Massachusetts, USA, with approaches ranging from seeing it as a first step to treatment to being a tool of last resort. Demand for ICC among family members may relate to inadequate access to voluntary treatment. Family interest in ICC appears to be driven by inadequate availability of treatment and other services. ICC at post-overdose outreach visits should be limited, if used at all.
非自愿民事住院治疗(ICC)是一种法律程序,通过该程序人们会被强制收治接受药物使用治疗。本研究探讨了美国马萨诸塞州公共卫生-公共安全过量用药后外展项目及其外展团队成员对ICC程序用于药物使用障碍的看法及推广情况。
在这项混合方法研究中,于2019年从过量用药后外展项目收集了调查数据,并在2019年和2020年对外展团队成员进行了半结构化访谈。
美国马萨诸塞州。
我们收到了138份调查回复,并对过量用药后外展团队成员(执法人员、康复教练、社会工作者和减少伤害工作者)进行了38次访谈,这些成员多数为男性(57%)且为白人(66%)。
我们使用该调查工具将项目分类为更关注ICC(在50%或更多的外展接触中讨论ICC)或较少关注ICC(在少于50%的外展接触中讨论ICC),并确定与每种分类相对应的项目特征。半结构化访谈探讨了工作人员对ICC有效性的看法。
在138个项目中,36%(n = 50)在50%或更多的外展接触中讨论了ICC。在大多数访视中讨论ICC与仅强调戒酒的项目理念呈正相关(36%对6%,P < 0.001)以及与药物法庭合作呈正相关(60%对30%,P < 0.001),但与纳洛酮分发呈负相关(48%对75%,P < 0.001)以及与转介到注射器服务项目呈负相关(26%对65%,P < 0.001)。定性访谈确定了三个主题:1)一些项目将ICC视为促使过量用药幸存者接受治疗的一线工具;2)其他项目认为ICC是万不得已的手段,对其益处持怀疑态度并担心潜在危害;3)家庭通常发起关于ICC的讨论,据说是出于绝望。
在美国马萨诸塞州,过量用药后外展项目对非自愿民事住院治疗(ICC)的推广情况似乎差异很大,其方法从将其视为治疗的第一步到视为万不得已的工具不等。家庭成员对ICC的需求可能与自愿治疗的可及性不足有关。家庭对ICC的兴趣似乎是由治疗及其他服务的可获得性不足所驱动。如果要使用的话,过量用药后外展访视中的ICC应受到限制。