Orthopedic Trauma Department, Yantaishan Hospital, 264001 Yantai, Shandong, China.
Ann Ital Chir. 2024;95(5):886-893. doi: 10.62713/aic.3527.
This study aims to assess the impact of combining multimodal analgesia with comfort care on pain levels, stress, negative emotions, and quality of life in individuals recovering from traumatic fractures.
This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from traumatic fracture patients who underwent emergency operations at our hospital between June 2022 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative pain management: the control group, which received standard measures, and the exposure group, which received a combination of multimodal analgesia and comfort-based care. We compared these groups for pain intensity (baseline and activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores), serum stress biomarkers (norepinephrine, adrenaline, cortisol), emotional distress (self-rating depression scale (SDS), and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)), and overall quality of life (Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) score). Overall, this study evaluated differences in postoperative complications between the two pain management approaches.
In this study, we included 101 participants, 41 in the exposed group and 60 in the control group. Before the intervention, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, one week after the intervention, the resting and active VAS scores were significantly reduced in the exposed group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, one week after the intervention, the exposed group had lower levels of serum sodium, epinephrine, cortisol, stress, and anxiety, as well as higher physical and mental health scores on the GQOLI-74 scale. During the intervention period, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Combining multi-mode analgesia with comfort management for patients with traumatic fractures significantly reduces postoperative pain and stress levels. Additionally, this approach can effectively enhance patients' negative emotions and improve their quality of life. This approach holds significant promise for practical use in clinical settings.
本研究旨在评估在创伤性骨折患者康复过程中,将多模式镇痛与舒适护理相结合对疼痛水平、应激、负性情绪和生活质量的影响。
这是一项回顾性研究,分析了 2022 年 6 月至 2024 年 2 月在我院接受急诊手术的创伤性骨折患者的临床数据。根据术后疼痛管理方法,将患者分为两组:对照组接受标准措施,观察组接受多模式镇痛和基于舒适的护理相结合。比较两组疼痛强度(基线和活动视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分)、血清应激生物标志物(去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素、皮质醇)、情绪困扰(自评抑郁量表(SDS)和自评焦虑量表(SAS))和总体生活质量(生活质量综合评定问卷(GQOLI-74)评分)。总的来说,本研究评估了两种疼痛管理方法在术后并发症方面的差异。
本研究共纳入 101 例患者,暴露组 41 例,对照组 60 例。干预前,两组基线特征相似(p>0.05)。然而,干预 1 周后,暴露组的静息和活动 VAS 评分明显低于对照组(p<0.05)。此外,干预 1 周后,暴露组血清钠、肾上腺素、皮质醇、应激和焦虑水平较低,GQOLI-74 量表的身心健康评分较高。干预期间,两组术后并发症无显著差异(p>0.05)。
将多模式镇痛与舒适护理相结合应用于创伤性骨折患者,可显著减轻术后疼痛和应激水平,有效改善患者的负性情绪,提高生活质量。该方法在临床实践中具有很大的应用潜力。