Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guide core needle biopsies in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions: a propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic performance of pancreatic lesions using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) with and without contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

METHOD

The patients were divided into two groups, US and CEUS group, based on whether CEUS was performed prior to biopsy. Before and after propensity score matching (PSM), the CNB-relevant characteristics of the two groups, including the first puncture success rate, the number of sampling, complication rate, type of complications, and degree of abdominal pain, were compared. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) of percutaneous US-guided CNB were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

This study included 277 patients (173 men and 104 women) with pancreatic lesions who underwent percutaneous CNB before PSM; 190 patients in the CEUS group, and 87 in the US group prior to CNB. After controlling for potential biases using PSM, no significant differences were observed in the complication rate, type of complications, or degree of abdominal pain between the CEUS and US groups (P > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed in the first puncture success rate and the number of sampling (P < 0.05). Importantly, before and after PSM, the CEUS group achieved a higher first-puncture success rate while obtaining a lower number of sampling (P < 0.05). Compared to the US group, the CEUS group demonstrated improved accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 13.1%, 14.9%, 13.4%, 2.5%, and 38.7%, respectively. Furthermore, the significant difference was observed in the AUC for diagnostic performance between the two groups when compared using DeLong's test (P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing CEUS before percutaneous CNB for pancreatic lesions can help achieve better biopsy results, reduce the number of punctures samples, increase the success rate of biopsies, and avoid the need for repeat biopsies.