Lammers Andrew R, Stakes Sarah A
Department of Health Sciences and Human Performance, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
School of Health Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol. 2025 Mar;343(2):159-171. doi: 10.1002/jez.2878. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
Quadrupedal animals traveling on arboreal supports change aspects of locomotion to avoid slipping and falls. This study compares locomotor biomechanics in two small mammals: first, the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) predominantly trots, which is a symmetrical gait. The second species, the Siberian chipmunk (Tamias sibiricus), primarily bounds or half-bounds. Trotting and bounding differ fundamentally in three aspects: location and timing of hand and foot placement; in the way that the trunk bends (trotting, mediolateral bending; bounding, flexion, and extension); and in the dynamics of the center of mass. Both species ran on a flat track and a 2 cm diameter cylindrical track, instrumented with a force plate or pole. For bounding chipmunks, the force pole was modified to measure force only on the right side. We measured speed, duty factor, and force, and calculated vertical, braking, propulsive, and net mediolateral impulses. Vertical and fore-aft impulses were different between trotting opossums and bounding chipmunks, but between trackway types, these impulses were similar within each species. The modifications used by each species to travel on arboreal supports were similar, except in one important respect. Net mediolateral impulse in opossums changed from laterally directed on the flat trackway to medial on the arboreal. But in chipmunks, these impulses on the flat track were medially-directed, and on the arboreal track, the amount of variability was substantially greater. We conclude that chipmunks-and perhaps any bounding animal-are less consistent from stride to stride in their locomotion. This inconsistency requires constant medial and lateral impulses to correct their trajectory when traveling on arboreal surfaces.
在树栖支撑物上移动的四足动物会改变运动方式以避免滑倒和跌落。本研究比较了两种小型哺乳动物的运动生物力学:第一种是灰短尾负鼠(Monodelphis domestica),主要以小跑方式移动,这是一种对称步态。第二种是西伯利亚花栗鼠(Tamias sibiricus),主要采用跳跃或半跳跃方式。小跑和跳跃在三个基本方面存在差异:手和脚的放置位置和时间;躯干弯曲的方式(小跑时为内外侧弯曲;跳跃时为屈伸);以及质心的动力学。两种动物都在平坦跑道和直径为2厘米的圆柱形跑道上奔跑,跑道上装有测力板或测力图。对于跳跃的花栗鼠,测力图经过改装,仅测量右侧的力。我们测量了速度、负荷系数和力,并计算了垂直、制动、推进和净内外侧冲量。小跑的负鼠和跳跃的花栗鼠之间的垂直和前后冲量不同,但在不同类型的跑道之间,每种动物的这些冲量相似。除了一个重要方面外,每种动物在树栖支撑物上移动时所采用的调整方式相似。负鼠在平坦跑道上的净内外侧冲量是侧向的,而在树栖跑道上则变为内侧。但在花栗鼠中,平坦跑道上的这些冲量是内侧的,而在树栖跑道上,变化量要大得多。我们得出结论,花栗鼠——也许还有任何跳跃的动物——在运动中每一步之间的一致性较差。这种不一致性要求在树栖表面移动时不断施加内侧和外侧冲量来校正它们的轨迹。