Wrist Stabilising Exercise Versus Hand Orthotic Intervention for Persons with Hypermobility - A Randomised Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of wrist stabilisation exercises compared to conventional intervention, whether it reduces pain and/or paraesthesia in the hand, as well as how the interventions affected activity ability, health-related quality of life and effects on hand function and grip strength in people with Hypermobility Diagnosis.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial.: Units of Occupational therapy in Primary Care, Kalmar County Council, SwedenParticipants: The study included 169 participants' data randomised to the Exercise group (n = 83) or the Control group (n = 86). The samples consisted of adults in diagnosed Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders or hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome with symptoms of pain and/or paraesthesia in the hands in the last three years.: The Exercise group trained according to structured progressive exercises and weights programme. The Control group used the hand orthosis during selected activities. Both groups performed randomised intervention for 12 weeks.: The primary outcome was the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were the Grip Ability Test, the Jamar dynamometer and the EuroQol EQ-5D.

RESULTS

There were 116 subjects who completed the intervention. There were no statistically significant difference between the wrist stabilisation exercise and the conventional intervention in terms of activity ability, health-related quality of life, hand function, grip strength, pain or paraesthesia in people with Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders or hypermobility Ehlers Danlos Syndrome.

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference between the Exercise group and the Control group regarding activity ability after 12 weeks intervention period.