• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[多发性硬化症中指南推荐的标准化工具:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的比较内容分析]

[Guideline-recommended standardized instruments in multiple sclerosis : A comparative content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)].

作者信息

Bolte Jasmin, Dilger Elise-Marie, Brütt Anna Levke

机构信息

Department für Versorgungsforschung, Fakultät VI Medizin und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Deutschland.

Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2024 Dec;95(12):1116-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z
PMID:39470772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11611974/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines serve as practice-based decision support and recommend the use of standardized instruments to measure functional capacity in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the extent to which a person's functioning is captured by these instruments is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to link the content of the MS disease guideline with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to capture the distribution of the content on the functional domains and contextual factors and to uncover existing gaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Instruments of the S2k guideline "Diagnosis and therapy of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum diseases and MOG-IgG-associated diseases", which were available free of charge in German or English and designed for adult people, were included. The instruments were classified into their meaningful concepts (meaningful concepts = MCs) and subsequently coded using standardized ICF rules by two raters.

RESULTS

The 23 included instruments contained 351 items and 718 MCs. Of these, 663 MCs could be linked to the ICF according to the coding rules. Of these, 51% (340 MCs) related to body functions, 44% (291 MCs) to the activity and participation component, and 5% (32 MCs) to environmental factors. The most frequently coded chapter was mobility (d4) with 201 MCs. Interrater agreement was k = 0.79.

DISCUSSION

The linking of the guideline-recommended instruments to the ICF shows that the instruments cover different themes. The area of environmental factors is underrepresented. The ICF linkage reveals a broad spectrum of functioning covered by the guideline-recommended instruments and facilitates the selection of appropriate instruments for the affected persons.

摘要

背景

指南作为基于实践的决策支持工具,推荐使用标准化工具来测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者的功能能力。然而,这些工具对个体功能的捕获程度尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在将MS疾病指南的内容与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)相联系,以了解功能领域和背景因素方面内容的分布情况,并发现存在的差距。

材料与方法

纳入了S2k指南“多发性硬化症、视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病和MOG-IgG相关疾病的诊断与治疗”中的工具,这些工具以德文或英文免费提供,且针对成年人设计。将这些工具分类为有意义的概念(有意义的概念=MCs),随后由两名评分者使用标准化的ICF规则进行编码。

结果

纳入的23种工具包含351个条目和718个MCs。其中根据编码规则,663个MCs可与ICF相联系。其中,51%(340个MCs)与身体功能相关,44%(291个MCs)与活动和参与部分相关,5%(32个MCs)与环境因素相关。编码最频繁的章节是活动能力(d4),有201个MCs。评分者间一致性为k = 0.79。

讨论

将指南推荐的工具与ICF相联系表明,这些工具涵盖了不同主题。环境因素领域的代表性不足。ICF联系揭示了指南推荐工具所涵盖的广泛功能范围,并有助于为受影响者选择合适的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/11611974/e3dba76788cf/115_2024_1752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/11611974/a2fae92bd2c8/115_2024_1752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/11611974/e3dba76788cf/115_2024_1752_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/11611974/a2fae92bd2c8/115_2024_1752_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f319/11611974/e3dba76788cf/115_2024_1752_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
[Guideline-recommended standardized instruments in multiple sclerosis : A comparative content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)].[多发性硬化症中指南推荐的标准化工具:基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的比较内容分析]
Nervenarzt. 2024 Dec;95(12):1116-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01752-z. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Content comparison of guideline-recommended instruments used in treatment for alcohol use disorders.指南推荐用于治疗酒精使用障碍的工具的内容比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jul;41(14):1682-1689. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1433724. Epub 2018 Feb 4.
3
Content comparison of long-term care instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的长期护理工具内容比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 17;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03824-2.
4
Comparing the content of participation instruments using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类比较参与工具的内容。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Nov 13;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-93.
5
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
6
Content comparison of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).基于国际功能、残疾与健康分类(ICF)的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)量表的内容比较
Qual Life Res. 2005 Jun;14(5):1225-37. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-4773-0.
7
Comparative content review of children's participation measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth.使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类-儿童和青少年》对儿童参与措施进行比较内容审查。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1):141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
8
Using the refined ICF Linking Rules to compare the content of existing instruments and assessments: a systematic review and exemplary analysis of instruments measuring participation.运用精细化的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)链接规则来比较现有工具和评估的内容:对用于测量参与度的工具进行系统评价和实例分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):584-600. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1198433. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
9
Which Components of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) are Covered by Cardiac Rehabilitation Assessment Tools among Individuals with Heart Failure?哪些《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)组成部分被心力衰竭患者的心脏康复评估工具所涵盖?
Heart Lung. 2024 Jan-Feb;63:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.09.010. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
10
Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons - Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets.将患者自评肘部评估(PREE)和美国肩肘外科医师协会肘部问卷(pASES-e)与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)及手部核心集相联系。
J Hand Ther. 2015 Jan-Mar;28(1):61-7; quiz 68. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis in Sensor-Based Jump Assessment.多发性硬化症患者在基于传感器的跳跃评估中的体验。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;12(6):610. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12060610.

本文引用的文献

1
Instruments measuring change in cognitive function in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.用于多发性硬化症认知功能改变的测量仪器:系统评价。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3009. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3009. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
[Data on multiple sclerosis in Germany and their representation in the ambulatory registry NeuroTransData (NTD) network].[德国多发性硬化症数据及其在门诊登记处神经传输数据(NTD)网络中的呈现]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;88(6):379-385. doi: 10.1055/a-1130-6222. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Multiple sclerosis - etiology and diagnostic potential.
多发性硬化症——病因及诊断潜力
Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2017 Jun 30;71(0):551-563. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.3836.
4
[Evaluation of Contextual Factors in Psychosomatic Rehabilitation].[身心康复中情境因素的评估]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2016 Dec;55(6):381-387. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-119897. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
5
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.关于多发性硬化症临床实践指南的系统评价
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e106762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106762. eCollection 2014.
6
Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.将健康状况测量与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系。
J Rehabil Med. 2002 Sep;34(5):205-10. doi: 10.1080/165019702760279189.