Byard Roger W
Adelaide School of Biomedicine, The University of Adelaide, Level 2, Room N237, Helen Mayo North, Frome Road, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2024 Oct 29. doi: 10.1007/s12024-024-00905-5.
Peer review of submitted manuscripts refers to the process of sending out papers for evaluation by suitably qualified academics/practitioners working in the same area. After their assessments and recommendations have been addressed by submitting authors editors will decide on whether publication is warranted or not. Unfortunately, 'peer review' has achieved a high status in courts without a real understanding of the way that the system works. Given that it has been deemed: 'a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works', greater understanding of the nature of peer review is required. The following paper provides an overview of its strengths and weaknesses.
对提交的手稿进行同行评审是指将论文发送给同一领域中具备适当资质的学者/从业者进行评估的过程。在提交作者针对他们的评估和建议做出回应后,编辑将决定是否值得发表。不幸的是,“同行评审”在法庭上获得了很高的地位,但人们并未真正理解该系统的运作方式。鉴于它被认为是“一个存在缺陷的过程,充满了容易识别的缺陷,而且几乎没有证据表明它是有效的”,因此需要对同行评审的本质有更深入的了解。以下论文概述了其优点和缺点。