Suppr超能文献

一项关于退伍军人事务部(VA)床边跨学科查房中患者及跨专业医疗团队成员体验的定性研究:语言、团队合作与信任

A Qualitative Study of Patient and Interprofessional Healthcare Team Member Experiences of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds at a VA: Language, Teamwork, and Trust.

作者信息

Mastalerz Katarzyna A, Jordan Sarah R, Connors Susan C

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Division of Healthcare Services, Molina Healthcare of Illinois, Downers Grove, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):538-546. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09124-8. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and interprofessional healthcare team member experiences of bedside interdisciplinary rounds (BIDR) are generally positive. Overall, there is large heterogeneity in existing BIDR frameworks, and best practices have not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

Understand patients' and interprofessional healthcare team members' experiences of BIDR.

SETTING

Academic VA Medical Center (VAMC) with daily structured BIDR.

PARTICIPANTS

Inpatients, nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators who participated in BIDR.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with study participants about their experiences with BIDR between January and June 2020. All interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. We used thematic analysis to identify key themes.

RESULTS

We interviewed 14 inpatients and 18 interprofessional healthcare team members, including nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators. Patients participating in BIDR reported positive perceptions of being included in the discussion of their healthcare plans and increased trust in providers; patient discomfort resulted from physician use of technical language and from being presented with unclear, vague care plans. Interdisciplinary healthcare team members participating in BIDR reported an increased understanding, respect, and trust for other team members and improved patient care; challenges were posed by lack of supportive structural elements to interprofessional workflow and prolonged physician presentations.

CONCLUSIONS

BIDR can build trust between patients and healthcare providers and within the interprofessional team by creating a setting where teamwork interactions can be observed. Based on our findings, we recommend trust-building practices for BIDR, which include sharing BIDR goals with patients, using patient-centered language, creating structures for interprofessional inclusion, defining team roles, using standardized communication, and addressing interprofessional inputs in real time.

摘要

背景

患者及跨专业医疗团队成员对床边跨学科查房(BIDR)的体验总体呈积极态度。总体而言,现有的BIDR框架存在很大异质性,且尚未明确最佳实践方法。

目的

了解患者及跨专业医疗团队成员对BIDR的体验。

地点

设有每日结构化BIDR的学术性退伍军人医疗中心(VAMC)。

参与者

参与BIDR的住院患者、护士、药剂师及护理协调员。

方法

2020年1月至6月,我们对研究参与者就其BIDR体验进行了半结构化定性访谈。所有访谈均进行了录音并由专业人员转录。我们采用主题分析法来确定关键主题。

结果

我们访谈了14名住院患者以及18名跨专业医疗团队成员,包括护士、药剂师和护理协调员。参与BIDR的患者表示,对参与其医疗计划讨论有积极感受,并且对医疗服务提供者的信任增加;患者的不适感源于医生使用专业术语以及所呈现的护理计划不清晰、含糊。参与BIDR的跨专业医疗团队成员表示,对其他团队成员的理解、尊重和信任有所增加,患者护理得到改善;跨专业工作流程缺乏支持性结构要素以及医生汇报时间过长带来了挑战。

结论

BIDR可通过营造一个能观察到团队协作互动的环境,在患者与医疗服务提供者之间以及跨专业团队内部建立信任。基于我们的研究结果,我们推荐了BIDR的信任建立做法,包括与患者分享BIDR目标、使用以患者为中心的语言、建立跨专业参与的架构、明确团队角色、使用标准化沟通以及实时处理跨专业意见。

相似文献

2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
10
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011 Dec;9(4):388-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00239.x.

本文引用的文献

3
How and why humans trust: A meta-analysis and elaborated model.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 27;14:1081086. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1081086. eCollection 2023.
4
Engaging resident physicians in the design, implementation, and assessment of bedside interdisciplinary rounds.
J Interprof Care. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):469-475. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2023.2176471. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Trust in healthcare: A new column in the Journal of Hospital Medicine.
J Hosp Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):3-4. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13005. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
Point/Counterpoint: Should patients be presented before entering the room during ward rounds?
J Hosp Med. 2023 Feb;18(2):188-192. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13003. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Decreasing Inappropriate Telemetry Use via Nursing-Driven Checklist and Electronic Health Record Order Set.
Cureus. 2022 Sep 10;14(9):e28999. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28999. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Frontline healthcare workers' perspectives on interprofessional teamwork during COVID-19.
J Interprof Educ Pract. 2022 Dec;29:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100550. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验