• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient-reported disability progression outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an outcomes-based agreement.多发性硬化症患者报告的残疾进展结局:基于结局的协议的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Nov;30(11):1211-1216. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1211.
2
The fiscal consequences of public health investments in disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis in Sweden.瑞典用于治疗多发性硬化症的疾病修正疗法的公共卫生投资的财政后果。
J Med Econ. 2020 Aug;23(8):831-837. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1757457. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Treatment with disease-modifying drugs for people with a first clinical attack suggestive of multiple sclerosis.对首次出现提示多发性硬化症临床发作的患者使用疾病修饰药物进行治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD012200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012200.pub2.
4
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫调节剂和免疫抑制剂治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的网状 Meta 分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD011381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub3.
5
Effect of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Interferon β-1a in Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: The CONNECT Randomized Clinical Trial.富马酸二甲酯与干扰素β-1a 治疗儿童发病多发性硬化症的效果比较:CONNECT 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30439.
6
Relapse outcomes, safety, and treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and initiated on subcutaneous interferon β-1a or dimethyl fumarate: a real-world study.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者皮下注射干扰素β-1a或富马酸二甲酯起始治疗后的复发结局、安全性及治疗模式:一项真实世界研究
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Dec;33(12):2099-2106. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1380616. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.比较疾病修饰药物用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线治疗的成本效益。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543.
8
Adverse effects of immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.免疫疗法治疗多发性硬化症的不良反应:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):CD012186. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012186.pub2.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Peginterferon Beta-1a and Alemtuzumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.聚乙二醇干扰素 β-1a 和阿仑单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6):666-676. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6.666.
10
The cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Canada.在加拿大,延迟释放二甲基富马酸酯治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2016 Jul;19(7):718-27. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1164174. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of the behavioral intervention for increasing physical activity in multiple sclerosis project: Secondary, patient-reported outcomes.随机对照试验增加多发性硬化症项目体力活动的行为干预:次要,患者报告的结果。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Feb;125:107056. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.107056. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
The Economic Burden of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: Estimate of Direct and Indirect Costs.美国多发性硬化症的经济负担:直接和间接成本的估计。
Neurology. 2022 May 3;98(18):e1810-e1817. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200150. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Outcomes-Based Contracting for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Necessary Conditions for Paradigm Adoption.多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法的基于结果的合同:采用该模式的必要条件。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2019 Dec;12(8):390-398.
4
Determination of Multiple Sclerosis Indicators for Value-Based Contracting Using the Delphi Method.采用德尔菲法确定基于价值的合同中的多发性硬化症指标。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jul;25(7):753-760. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.7.753.
5
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of disease-modifying therapies in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的疾病修正治疗的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2020 Dec;267(12):3489-3498. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09395-w. Epub 2019 May 25.
6
The prevalence of MS in the United States: A population-based estimate using health claims data.美国多发性硬化症的患病率:基于健康索赔数据的人群估计。
Neurology. 2019 Mar 5;92(10):e1029-e1040. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007035. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
7
Value-based arrangements may be more prevalent than assumed.基于价值的安排可能比想象的更为普遍。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Feb;25(2):70-76.
8
Disability Outcome Measures in Phase III Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis.多发性硬化症 III 期临床试验中的残疾结局测量。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Jun;32(6):543-558. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0530-8.
9
Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.实践指南推荐摘要:多发性硬化症成人的疾病修正治疗:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会的报告。
Neurology. 2018 Apr 24;90(17):777-788. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005347.
10
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements for Pharmaceutical Products in the United States: A Systematic Review.美国药品的基于绩效的风险分担安排:系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1028-1040. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1028.

多发性硬化症患者报告的残疾进展结局:基于结局的协议的结果。

Patient-reported disability progression outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an outcomes-based agreement.

机构信息

Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Center for High-Value Health Care, Pittsburgh, PA.

Pharmacy Services, UPMC Insurance Services Division, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Nov;30(11):1211-1216. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1211.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1211
PMID:39471272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522456/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Outcomes-based agreements (OBAs) are agreements between payers and manufacturers in which payment for medications is tied to patient outcomes. These contracts aim to measure the value of prescription medications on predefined clinical indicators in real-world patient populations. OBAs are gaining traction in the United States as the health care industry shifts from volume-based to value-based care. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an appealing therapeutic area for OBAs because of its prevalence, high cost of medications, and multiple effective therapeutic options.

OBJECTIVE

To describe findings from an OBA that was prospectively conducted in a large regional health system for patients with MS taking interferon β-1a or dimethyl fumarate.

METHODS

In this prospective real-world analysis, commercial or health insurance exchange members were included based on the parameters of the OBA. Disability progression was assessed using a patient-reported outcome, patient-determined disease steps (PDDS). In the OBA, members aged 18 years or older with an MS diagnosis were included in the contract. A baseline score was collected for eligible members, with follow-up scores occurring between a 90-day and 180-day postbaseline score. If a follow-up score was greater than the baseline score, a subsequent PDDS score was collected between 90-days and 120-days to determine if the PDDS score remained elevated, indicating that the member had disability progression.

RESULTS

During the contract period, 410 patients were eligible for PDDS collection, with 241 and 169 patients in the dimethyl fumarate and interferon β-1a cohorts, respectively. There were 162 patients who were lost to follow-up, and 64 patients who were ineligible per contract parameters. Of the remaining 184 eligible patients (107 on dimethyl fumarate and 77 on interferon β-1a), 21 (11%) patients had confirmed disability progression (6 on dimethyl fumarate [5.6%] and 15 on interferon β-1a [19.5%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that meaningful patient-reported outcomes, such as disability progression, can be operationalized in an innovative OBA.

摘要

背景

基于结果的协议(OBAs)是支付方和制造商之间的协议,其中药物的支付与患者的结果挂钩。这些合同旨在根据预设的临床指标,在现实世界的患者群体中衡量处方药物的价值。随着医疗保健行业从基于数量的护理转向基于价值的护理,OBAs 在美国越来越受欢迎。多发性硬化症(MS)是 OBA 的一个有吸引力的治疗领域,因为它的发病率高,药物费用高,并且有多种有效的治疗选择。

目的

描述在一个大型地区性卫生系统中对接受干扰素β-1a 或二甲基富马酸酯治疗的多发性硬化症患者进行的前瞻性 OBA 的结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性真实世界分析中,根据 OBA 的参数纳入商业或健康保险交易所成员。残疾进展使用患者报告的结果、患者确定的疾病步骤(PDDS)进行评估。在 OBA 中,年龄在 18 岁或以上且患有 MS 诊断的成员被纳入合同。对符合条件的成员收集基线评分,并在基线评分后 90 至 180 天之间进行后续评分。如果后续评分大于基线评分,则在 90 至 120 天之间收集后续 PDDS 评分,以确定 PDDS 评分是否仍然升高,表明成员的残疾进展。

结果

在合同期间,有 410 名患者有资格进行 PDDS 采集,二甲基富马酸酯和干扰素β-1a 队列分别有 241 名和 169 名患者。有 162 名患者失访,64 名患者因合同参数不合格。在其余 184 名符合条件的患者中(二甲基富马酸酯组 107 名,干扰素β-1a 组 77 名),有 21 名(11%)患者确认残疾进展(二甲基富马酸酯组 6 名[5.6%],干扰素β-1a 组 15 名[19.5%])。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,可以在创新的 OBA 中对有意义的患者报告结果(如残疾进展)进行操作。