• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习模型预测胸膜感染中胸膜内组织纤溶酶原激活剂和脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗失败:一项多中心研究

Machine Learning Model Predictors of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and DNase Failure in Pleural Infection: A Multicenter Study.

作者信息

Khemasuwan Danai, Wilshire Candice, Reddy Chakravarthy, Gilbert Christopher, Gorden Jed, Balwan Akshu, Sanchez Trinidad M, Bixby Billie, Sorensen Jeffrey S, Shojaee Samira

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.

Department of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Center for Lung Research in Honor of Wayne Gittinger, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Feb;22(2):187-192. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-151OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-151OC
PMID:39471322
Abstract

Intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase has been shown to reduce the need for surgical intervention for complicated parapneumonic effusion/empyema (CPPE/empyema). Failure of IET may lead to delayed care and increased length of stay. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of IET. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of patients who received IET for the treatment of CPPE/empyema. Clinical and radiological variables at the time of diagnosis were included. We compared four different machine learning classifiers (L1-penalized logistic regression, support vector machine [SVM], extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost], and light gradient-boosting machine [LightGBM]) by multiple bootstrap-validated metrics, including F-β, to demonstrate model performances. A total of 466 participants who received IET for pleural infection were included from five institutions across the United States. Resolution of CPPE/empyema with IET was achieved in 78% ( = 365). SVM performed superiorly, with median F-β of 56%, followed by L1-penalized logistic regression, LightGBM, and XGBoost. Clinical and radiological variables were graded based on their ranked variable importance. The top two significant predictors of IET failure using SVM were the presence of an abscess/necrotizing pneumonia (17%) and pleural thickening (13%). Similarly, LightGBM identified abscess/necrotizing pneumonia (35%) and pleural thickening (26%) and XGBoost indicated pleural thickening (36%) and abscess/necrotizing pneumonia (17%) as the most significant predictors of treatment failure. Predictors identified by the L1-penalized logistic regression model were pleural thickening (18%) and pleural fluid lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (9%). The presence of abscess/necrotizing pneumonia and pleural thickening consistently ranked among the strongest predictors of IET failure in all machine learning models. The difference in rankings between models may be a consequence of the different algorithms used by each model. These results indicate that the presence of abscess/necrotizing pneumonia and pleural thickening may predict IET failure. These results should be confirmed in larger studies.

摘要

组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)和脱氧核糖核酸酶进行的胸膜内酶疗法(IET)已被证明可减少复杂类肺炎性胸腔积液/脓胸(CPPE/脓胸)的手术干预需求。IET失败可能导致治疗延迟和住院时间延长。本研究的目的是确定IET失败的风险因素。我们对接受IET治疗CPPE/脓胸的患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。纳入了诊断时的临床和放射学变量。我们通过包括F-β在内的多个自助验证指标比较了四种不同的机器学习分类器(L1惩罚逻辑回归、支持向量机[SVM]、极端梯度提升[XGBoost]和轻梯度提升机[LightGBM]),以展示模型性能。来自美国五个机构的总共466名接受IET治疗胸膜感染的参与者被纳入研究。78%(n = 365)的患者通过IET实现了CPPE/脓胸的消退。SVM表现最佳,中位F-β为56%,其次是L1惩罚逻辑回归、LightGBM和XGBoost。临床和放射学变量根据其排序后的变量重要性进行分级。使用SVM时,IET失败的前两个重要预测因素是脓肿/坏死性肺炎的存在(17%)和胸膜增厚(13%)。同样,LightGBM确定脓肿/坏死性肺炎(35%)和胸膜增厚(26%),XGBoost指出胸膜增厚(36%)和脓肿/坏死性肺炎(17%)是治疗失败的最重要预测因素。L1惩罚逻辑回归模型确定的预测因素是胸膜增厚(18%)和胸腔积液乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)(9%)。在所有机器学习模型中,脓肿/坏死性肺炎和胸膜增厚的存在一直是IET失败的最强预测因素之一。模型之间排名的差异可能是由于每个模型使用的算法不同。这些结果表明,脓肿/坏死性肺炎和胸膜增厚的存在可能预测IET失败。这些结果应在更大规模的研究中得到证实。

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Model Predictors of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator and DNase Failure in Pleural Infection: A Multicenter Study.机器学习模型预测胸膜感染中胸膜内组织纤溶酶原激活剂和脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗失败:一项多中心研究
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Feb;22(2):187-192. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-151OC.
2
Predictive Variables for Failure in Administration of Intrapleural Tissue Plasminogen Activator/Deoxyribonuclease in Patients With Complicated Parapneumonic Effusions/Empyema.预测复杂类肺炎性胸腔积液/脓胸患者胸腔内注射组织型纤溶酶原激活物/脱氧核糖核酸酶治疗失败的相关因素。
Chest. 2018 Sep;154(3):550-556. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.037. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
3
Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus conservative management in the treatment of adult parapneumonic effusions and empyema.胸膜内纤维蛋白溶解疗法与保守治疗在成人肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸治疗中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD002312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002312.pub3.
4
Choice of intrapleural fibrinolytic agents in the treatment of adult complicated parapneumonic effusion and empyema: Network meta-analysis.治疗成人复杂性脓胸性胸腔积液的胸腔内纤维蛋白溶解药物选择:网络荟萃分析。
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2023 Jun;31(5):451-458. doi: 10.1177/02184923231180990. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
5
Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy versus conservative management in the treatment of parapneumonic effusions and empyema.胸膜内纤维蛋白溶解疗法与保守治疗在肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸治疗中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD002312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002312.pub2.
6
Intra-pleural fibrinolytic therapy vs. conservative management in the treatment of parapneumonic effusions and empyema.胸膜内纤维蛋白溶解疗法与保守治疗在治疗肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(3):CD002312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002312.
7
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.胸腔积脓的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.
8
Comparing the outcomes of intrapleural fibrinolytic and DNase therapy versus intrapleural fibrinolytic or DNase therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较胸腔内纤维蛋白溶解和 DNase 治疗与单纯胸腔内纤维蛋白溶解或 DNase 治疗的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Dec;71:102081. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2021.102081. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
10
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based Diagnostic model for determining the etiology of pleural effusion using Age, ADA and LDH.基于机器学习的诊断模型,用于利用年龄、腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)确定胸腔积液的病因
Respir Res. 2025 May 2;26(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03253-2.
2
Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care.胸外科中的人工智能:一篇将创新与下一代外科护理临床实践相联系的综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2729. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082729.