Pavlou K N, Hoefer M A, Blackburn G L
Ann Surg. 1986 Feb;203(2):136-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198602000-00005.
The predicted resting metabolic rate (pRMR), as is estimated by the Harris-Benedict equation (HBE), was compared with the actual resting metabolic rate (mRMR), as assessed by indirect calorimetry, in 31 moderately obese (mean above ideal body weight = 44 +/- 2.8%) male subjects (mean age = 48 +/- 4.5 years; mean weight = 107.3 +/- 17.1 kg; mean% fat = 34 +/- 3.9). Measured resting metabolic rate (mRMR) (1,942 +/- 293 kcal/day) was found to be significantly (p less than 0.001) lower than pRMR (2,108 +/- 270 kcal/day), but significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than pRMR (1,636 +/- 133 kcal/day), if ideal body weight was used in the HBE formula. Individual variation of the mRMR and pRMR ranged from 65-105% and 95-155% of the expected normal population values, respectively. The findings suggest that if the reduced daily caloric needs observed are added to the metabolic suppression occurring during dietary restriction, it might explain why many obese individuals experience difficulties in maintaining predicted rates of weight loss. An equation was derived to predict RMR in moderately obese male patients.
通过哈里斯-本尼迪克特方程(HBE)估算的预测静息代谢率(pRMR),与通过间接量热法评估的实际静息代谢率(mRMR),在31名中度肥胖男性受试者(平均超过理想体重 = 44 ± 2.8%)中进行了比较(平均年龄 = 48 ± 4.5岁;平均体重 = 107.3 ± 17.1千克;平均体脂百分比 = 34 ± 3.9)。发现测量的静息代谢率(mRMR)(1942 ± 293千卡/天)显著低于pRMR(2108 ± 270千卡/天)(p < 0.001),但如果在HBE公式中使用理想体重,则显著高于pRMR(1636 ± 133千卡/天)(p < 0.001)。mRMR和pRMR的个体差异分别为预期正常人群值的65 - 105%和95 - 155%。研究结果表明,如果将观察到的每日热量需求减少量与饮食限制期间发生的代谢抑制相加,这可能解释了为什么许多肥胖个体在维持预测的体重减轻率方面存在困难。推导了一个方程来预测中度肥胖男性患者的静息代谢率。