Suppr超能文献

使用CORE和CORE+评分预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的再入院情况。

Prediction of Hospital Readmission Using the CORE and CORE+ Scores in Persons With COPD.

作者信息

Elshafei Ahmad A, Nehrenz Guy, Hardigan Patrick C, Becker Ellen A

机构信息

Dr. Elshafei is affiliated with Department of Respiratory Care, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Health Science, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Drs. Nehrenz and Hardigan are affiliated with Department of Health Science, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2025 Mar;70(3):258-267. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11766. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

Identifying persons with COPD at high risk for hospital readmission provides opportunities for efficient and appropriate care to lower readmission risk. This study examined 30-d and 60-d hospital readmission prediction of the COPD-readmission (CORE) score and a newly developed CORE+ score. The relationship between CORE and CORE+ scores and ICU admission, endotracheal intubation, and in-hospital noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use was explored. A retrospective cohort study evaluated participants with spirometry-confirmed COPD from 2 Midwestern academic hospitals. The CORE score variables included eosinophil blood count, FEV/FVC (<0.70) and FEV (≤40% of predicted), triple inhaler therapy, previous hospitalization, and presence of neuromuscular disease. Out-of-hospital NIV use and Charlson comorbidity index were added to compose the CORE+ score. Researchers assessed associations between variables and outcomes with chi-square test or Fisher exact test, compared results of CORE and CORE+ scores with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, assessed each score's 30-d and 60-d readmission predictive power with multiple logistic regression, and evaluated predictive accuracy with AUC of receiver operating characteristic using alpha < 0.05. Of 391 participants, the study found a 22% 30-d, all-cause readmission rate and a 16% 60-d, all-cause readmission rate. CORE+ score had better predictive accuracy than the CORE score for 30-d readmission (area under the curve 0.81 [95% CI 0.76-0.86]; AUC 0.73 [95% CI 0.66-0.79],  < .001) and 60-d readmission (AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.71-0.83]; AUC 0.75 [95% CI 0.69-0.81],  < .001). Participants who used in-hospital NIV had higher median CORE+ scores ( = < .001). CORE and CORE+ scores demonstrated good to very good predictive accuracy for 30-d and 60-d readmission, respectively. Moreover, this study demonstrated a linear relationship between in-hospital NIV use and CORE+ score.

摘要

识别慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者再次入院的高风险人群,可为采取有效且恰当的护理措施以降低再入院风险提供机会。本研究检验了COPD再入院(CORE)评分及新开发的CORE+评分对30天和60天再次入院的预测能力。探讨了CORE和CORE+评分与入住重症监护病房(ICU)、气管插管及院内无创通气(NIV)使用之间的关系。一项回顾性队列研究评估了来自2家美国中西部学术医院的、经肺功能测定确诊为COPD的参与者。CORE评分变量包括嗜酸性粒细胞计数、第一秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(FEV/FVC,<0.70)及第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV,≤预测值的40%)、三联吸入器治疗、既往住院史及神经肌肉疾病的存在情况。将院外NIV使用情况及Charlson合并症指数纳入以构成CORE+评分。研究人员采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验评估变量与结局之间的关联,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较CORE和CORE+评分的结果,采用多元逻辑回归评估每个评分对30天和60天再入院的预测能力,并使用α<0.05的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估预测准确性。在391名参与者中,该研究发现30天全因再入院率为22%,60天全因再入院率为16%。CORE+评分对30天再入院的预测准确性优于CORE评分(曲线下面积0.81[95%CI 0.76 - 0.86];AUC 0.73[95%CI 0.66 - 0.79],P<0.001),对60天再入院的预测准确性亦如此(AUC 0.77[95%CI 0.71 - 0.83];AUC 0.75[95%CI 0.69 - 0.81],P<0.001)。使用院内NIV的参与者的CORE+评分中位数更高(P<0.001)。CORE和CORE+评分分别对30天和60天再入院显示出良好至极优的预测准确性。此外,本研究证明了院内NIV使用与CORE+评分之间存在线性关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验