Suppr超能文献

评估新提出的ARDS定义在接受高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗的COVID-19住院患者中的应用。

Evaluating the Newly Proposed ARDS Definition in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Treated With High-Flow Nasal Oxygen.

作者信息

Isha Shahin, Olaizola Gustavo, Carboni Bisso Indalecio, Raavi Lekhya, Jonna Sadhana, Jenkins Anna, Hanson Abby, Kashyap Rahul, Monzon Veronica, Huespe Ivan A, Sanghavi Devang

机构信息

Drs Isha, Raavi, Jonna, and Sanghavi and Mss Jenkins and Hanson are affiliated with Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

Mr Olaizola and Dr Huespe are affiliated with Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; and Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2025 Feb;70(2):119-125. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11933. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

The new Global definition of ARDS recently introduced a subgroup known as non-intubated ARDS. This study aimed to assess the risk of progression from noninvasive oxygen support to intubation and ARDS severity based on the S/F among non-intubated subjects with ARDS. This retrospective study included subjects with COVID-19 admitted to 7 hospitals (5 in the United States and 2 in Argentina) from January 2020-January 2023. Subjects meeting the new non-intubated ARDS definition (high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC] with an S/F ≤315 [with S ≤97%] or a P/F ≤300 mm Hg while receiving ≥30 L/min O via HFNC) were included. The study evaluated the proportion of subjects who progressed to intubation, severity levels using the S/F cutoff proposed in the new ARDS definition, and mortality. Nine hundred sixty-five non-intubated subjects with ARDS were included, of whom 27% ( 262) progressed to meet the Berlin criteria within a median of 3 d (interquartile range 2-6). The overall mortality was 23% (95% CI 20-26) ( = 225), and among subjects who progressed to the Berlin criteria, it was 37% (95% CI 31-43) ( = 98). Additionally, the worst S/F within 1 d of ARDS diagnosis was correlated with mortality, with mortality rates of 26% (95% CI 23-30) ( 177) for subjects with S/F ≤148, 17% (95% CI 12-23) ( 38) for those with S/F between 149-234, and 16% (95% CI 8-28) ( 10) for subjects maintaining an S/F higher than 235 ( < .001). The non-intubated ARDS criteria encompassed a broader spectrum of subjects with lower in-hospital mortality compared to the Berlin criteria. The S/F and ARDS severity cutoff proposed in the new Global ARDS definition were valuable predictors of in-hospital mortality in these subjects.

摘要

最近推出的ARDS全球新定义引入了一个名为非插管型ARDS的亚组。本研究旨在评估非插管型ARDS患者中,基于氧合指数(S/F)从无创氧疗进展到插管以及ARDS严重程度的风险。这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年1月期间在7家医院(美国5家,阿根廷2家)收治的COVID-19患者。纳入符合新的非插管型ARDS定义的患者(使用高流量鼻导管[HFNC]时S/F≤315[当S≤97%]或在通过HFNC接受≥30L/min氧气时P/F≤300mmHg)。该研究评估了进展到插管的患者比例、使用新ARDS定义中提出的S/F临界值的严重程度水平以及死亡率。纳入了900例非插管型ARDS患者,其中27%(262例)在中位数为3天(四分位间距2 - 6天)内进展到符合柏林标准。总体死亡率为23%(95%CI 20 - 26)(n = 225),在进展到柏林标准的患者中,死亡率为37%(95%CI 31 - 43)(n = 98)。此外,ARDS诊断后1天内最差的S/F与死亡率相关,S/F≤148的患者死亡率为26%(95%CI 23 - 30)(n = 177),S/F在149 - 234之间的患者死亡率为17%(95%CI 12 - 23)(n = 38),S/F高于235的患者死亡率为16%(95%CI 8 - 28)(n = 10)(P <.001)。与柏林标准相比,非插管型ARDS标准涵盖了更广泛的患者群体,且院内死亡率更低。新的全球ARDS定义中提出的S/F和ARDS严重程度临界值是这些患者院内死亡率的重要预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验