Takeda Ryosuke, Hirono Tetsuya, Yoshiko Akito, Kunugi Shun, Okudaira Masamichi, Ueda Saeko, Nishikawa Taichi, Watanabe Kohei
Laboratory of Neuromuscular Biomechanics, School of Health and Sport Science, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan.
Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Exp Physiol. 2025 Feb;110(2):307-320. doi: 10.1113/EP091981. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
This study aimed to determine the difference in motor unit (MU) firing pattern between hypertensive and normotensive individuals, and the relationship between MU firing pattern and post-exercise blood pressure (BP) response in older individuals. Fourteen older untreated (systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) ≥ 130/80 mmHg, 76 (5) years), 11 treated hypertensive (78 (4) years) and 14 normotensive (SBP/DBP < 130/80 mmHg, 71 (4) years) individuals were studied. Participants performed ramp-up exercises until 50% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of knee extension and five MVCs. During the ramp-up exercise, high-density surface electromyography signals were recorded and each MU firing rate (FR) and recruitment threshold was assessed. The slope of the linear regression between MUFRs and recruitment thresholds was calculated to assess the MU firing pattern. Pre- and post-exercise blood pressure was measured. Change in (∆)SBP from pre- to post-exercise was greater in treated hypertensive than untreated hypertensive individuals (P = 0.026). MUFR was lower in treated hypertensive than untreated hypertensive and normotensive individuals (P < 0.001). Although the slope was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.294), FRs of larger MUs were lower than those of smaller MUs in treated hypertensive and normotensive individuals (P < 0.05) but sustained in untreated hypertensive individuals. The FRs of larger MUs and slope were positively correlated with the ∆SBP only in hypertensive individuals (r = 0.768 and 0.715; P = 0.044 and 0.020). MUFR was lower in treated hypertensive than untreated hypertensive and normotensive individuals. Furthermore, MU firing patterns were associated with the ∆SBP after exercise in older untreated hypertensive individuals, but this relationship was not observed in treated hypertensive and normotensive individuals.
本研究旨在确定高血压个体与血压正常个体之间运动单位(MU)放电模式的差异,以及老年个体中MU放电模式与运动后血压(BP)反应之间的关系。研究了14名未接受治疗的老年个体(收缩压/舒张压(SBP/DBP)≥130/80 mmHg,76(5)岁)、11名接受治疗的高血压患者(78(4)岁)和14名血压正常个体(SBP/DBP < 130/80 mmHg,71(4)岁)。参与者进行递增运动,直至达到膝关节伸展最大自主收缩(MVC)的50%以及五次MVC。在递增运动期间,记录高密度表面肌电图信号,并评估每个MU的放电频率(FR)和募集阈值。计算MUFR与募集阈值之间线性回归的斜率,以评估MU放电模式。测量运动前后的血压。治疗组高血压患者运动前后收缩压的变化(∆)大于未治疗组高血压患者(P = 0.026)。治疗组高血压患者的MUFR低于未治疗组高血压患者和血压正常个体(P < 0.001)。尽管各组之间斜率无显著差异(P = 0.294),但在治疗组高血压患者和血压正常个体中,较大MU的FR低于较小MU(P < 0.05),而在未治疗组高血压患者中则持续存在。仅在高血压个体中,较大MU的FR和斜率与∆SBP呈正相关(r = 0.768和0.715;P = 0.044和0.020)。治疗组高血压患者的MUFR低于未治疗组高血压患者和血压正常个体。此外,在未治疗的老年高血压个体中,MU放电模式与运动后∆SBP相关,但在治疗组高血压患者和血压正常个体中未观察到这种关系。