• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缩小切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gutiérrez-Ramírez Lucía, Morandeira-Rivas Antonio, Medina-Benítez Elisa, Arias-Arias Ángel, Moreno-Sanz Carlos

机构信息

Research Support Unit, Hospital Universitario Mancha Centro, 13600, Alcázar de San Juan, Spain.

Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071, Toledo, Spain.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4519-4530. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07555-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07555-0
PMID:39472341
Abstract

This systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of reduced port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and compared its potential advantages over the conventional laparoscopic approach. Eighteen eligible articles were analyzed, including thirteen cohort studies and five randomized trials (n = 2945). There were no differences in total postoperative complications [OR of 0.99 (0.72 to 1.37)] nor those classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb. There were also no differences regarding operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain, weight loss, and improvement in comorbidities. In the reduced port group, hospital stay was slightly shorter [WDM of - 0.23 (- 0.39 to - 0.07)], and cosmetic results were better in the short term. Our meta-analysis shows reduced port sleeve gastrectomy can be safely performed in selected patients, although clinical benefits are unclear (PROSPERO (CRD42022372829)).

摘要

本系统评价评估了减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的安全性和有效性,并比较了其相对于传统腹腔镜手术方法的潜在优势。分析了18篇符合条件的文章,包括13项队列研究和5项随机试验(n = 2945)。术后总并发症[比值比为0.99(0.72至1.37)]以及分类为Clavien-Dindo≥IIIb级的并发症均无差异。在手术时间、失血量、术后疼痛、体重减轻和合并症改善方面也没有差异。在减少端口组中,住院时间略短[加权差值为-0.23(-0.39至-0.07)],短期内美容效果更好。我们的荟萃分析表明,减少端口袖状胃切除术可以在选定的患者中安全进行,尽管临床益处尚不清楚(国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(CRD42022372829))。

相似文献

1
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.缩小切口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Dec;34(12):4519-4530. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07555-0. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
2
Does single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy result in improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy?单孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜袖状胃切除术相比,是否能改善短期围手术期结局?
Int J Surg. 2015 Oct;22:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
3
Antrum Preservation Versus Antrum Resection in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中胃窦保留与胃窦切除的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Invest Surg. 2025 Dec;38(1):2477099. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2025.2477099. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
4
Three-Trocar Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Standard Five-Trocar Technique: a Randomized Controlled Trial.三孔套管胃切除术与标准五孔技术:一项随机对照试验。
Obes Surg. 2017 Dec;27(12):3142-3148. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2760-0.
5
Three-Year Follow-Up of Laparoscopic Reduced Port Sleeve Gastrectomy in 808 Consecutive Patients.808例连续患者腹腔镜减孔袖状胃切除术的三年随访
Obes Surg. 2017 Oct;27(10):2643-2648. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2690-x.
6
Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: A Meta-Analysis.单孔与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖症的Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun;28(6):690-699. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0245. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
8
Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Treatments for Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Mid-Term Results.腹腔镜胃大弯折叠术和腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗肥胖症:短期和中期结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Oct;28(10):3199-3212. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3330-9.
9
Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopic versus single-port sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study.传统腹腔镜与单孔袖状胃切除术术后疼痛的前瞻性、随机、对照试验研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Apr;13(4):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
10
Surgical Technique: Laparoscopic Gastric Sleeve Resection in Super-Obese Patients.手术技术:超级肥胖患者的腹腔镜胃袖状切除术
J Invest Surg. 2018 Jun;31(3):165-167. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1289284. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Safety and Aesthetic Benefits of Reduced Port Bikini-Line Sleeve Gastrectomy (RBSG): An Initial Report.评估缩小切口比基尼线袖状胃切除术(RBSG)的安全性和美学益处:初步报告
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08176-x.
2
Port Site Placement and Outcomes for Surgical Obesity and Metabolic Surgeries (PSPOSO) Checklist: A New Reporting Checklist Based on Evidential Assessment of the Number of Trocars and Positions.外科肥胖与代谢手术的切口位置与结果(PSPOSO)检查表:基于对套管针数量和位置的证据评估制定的新报告检查表
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):1086-1108. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Magnetic-Assisted Reduced-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Comparative Study.磁辅助小切口袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的对比研究。
Obes Surg. 2023 Jul;33(7):2261-2265. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06628-w. Epub 2023 May 20.
2
2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.2022年美国代谢与减重外科学会(ASMBS)和国际肥胖与代谢病外科联盟(IFSO):代谢与减重手术的适应证
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Dec;18(12):1345-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.013. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Staple Line Reinforcement During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术时缝线加固:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2022 May;32(5):1466-1478. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-05950-z. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Prevention of incisional hernia after single-port sleeve gastrectomy (PRISM): a prospective non-randomized controlled study.单孔套管胃切除术(PRISM)后切口疝的预防:一项前瞻性非随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7225-7232. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09088-y. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Safety and effectiveness of reduced-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Asian morbidly obese patients.减少端口腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在亚洲病态肥胖患者中的安全性和有效性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 6;11(1):23511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02999-1.
6
Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人减重手术治疗肥胖症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2440-2456. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08283-z. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Severe Obesity: Review and Perspectives.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术治疗重度肥胖症:综述与展望。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2781-2790. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04620-2.
8
Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity: a Meta-Analysis.单切口与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖的比较:荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jun;30(6):2186-2198. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04437-z.
9
Single-Port Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Follow-up of Weight Loss, Comorbidity Resolution, and Cost.单孔袖状胃切除术与传统腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的比较:减重、合并症缓解和成本的 5 年随访结果。
Surg Innov. 2020 Jun;27(3):265-271. doi: 10.1177/1553350620902550. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
10
Single-port versus multiport laparoscopic surgery comparing long-term patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome.单孔与多孔腹腔镜手术比较长期患者满意度和美容效果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5533-5539. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07351-3. Epub 2020 Jan 28.