Department of Thoracic Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, 147 Jiankang Road, Zhujing Town, Jinshan District, Shanghai, China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 29;19(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03030-0.
To investigate the clinical effect of thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the treatment of lung malignancies less than 2CM in diameter.
In this retrospective study, a total of 103 patients with lung cancer who received outpatient or inpatient treatment from December 2020 to May 2022 were selected and divided into the lobectomy group (n = 48) and the segmentectomy group (n = 55) according to different surgical methods. The lobectomy group was treated with thoracoscopic lobectomy, while the segmentectomy group was treated with thoracoscopic segmentectomy. The prognostic effect, complications, blood gas level and respiratory function indexes of the two groups were observed and compared.
The general data of the two groups of patients, such as gender, age, course of disease, body mass index, lesion diameter, lesion site and pathological type, were analyzed by statistical software. There was no statistical significance in the operation time and the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups (P > 0.05), while the drainage volume and intraoperative blood loss in the segmentectomy group were lower than those in the lobectomy group, and the drainage time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the lobectomy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences in various lung function indexes between the two groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, the values of FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in each group had different amplitude changes, and the values of FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in the segmentectomy group were significantly higher than those in the lobectomy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Thoracoscopic segmentectomy showed a lower incidence of respiratory complications (P = 0.042) and higher pulmonary air leak (P = 0.023) than thoracoscopic lobectomy. After propensity score-matched analysis, respiratory complications remained significantly higher in thoracoscopic segmentectomy (P = 0.017). However, the difference in the total complication rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There were no differences during the 2-year follow-up (median follow-up in months: 18.4; interquartile range, 14.8-21.3) in terms of overall survival (P = 0.49) and disease-free survival (P = 0.34) between groups (P > 0.05).
For patients with lung cancer less than 2 cm in diameter, thoracoscopic segmentectomy can achieve good short-term efficacy, with rapid postoperative recovery and little impact on lung function, which may be helpful to improve patients' postoperative quality of life.
探讨胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗直径小于 2cm 肺部恶性肿瘤的临床效果。
本回顾性研究选取 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月间在我院门诊或住院治疗的肺癌患者 103 例,根据手术方法不同分为肺叶切除术组(n=48)和肺段切除术组(n=55)。肺叶切除术组采用胸腔镜肺叶切除术,肺段切除术组采用胸腔镜肺段切除术。观察比较两组患者的预后效果、并发症、血气水平和呼吸功能指标。
采用统计软件分析两组患者的一般资料,如性别、年龄、病程、体质量指数、病灶直径、病灶部位和病理类型,两组患者的手术时间和淋巴结清扫数量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而肺段切除术组的引流量和术中出血量低于肺叶切除术组,引流时间和住院时间短于肺叶切除术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组患者各项肺功能指标比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的 FVC、FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 值均有不同幅度的变化,且肺段切除术组的 FVC、FEV1 和 FEV1/FVC 值明显高于肺叶切除术组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。胸腔镜肺段切除术的呼吸并发症发生率(P=0.042)低于胸腔镜肺叶切除术,肺空气漏发生率(P=0.023)高于胸腔镜肺叶切除术。经过倾向评分匹配分析后,胸腔镜肺段切除术的呼吸并发症仍显著较高(P=0.017)。然而,两组总并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。在 2 年随访期间(中位随访时间为 18.4 个月,四分位间距为 14.8-21.3 个月),两组患者的总生存率(P=0.49)和无病生存率(P=0.34)差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
对于直径小于 2cm 的肺癌患者,胸腔镜肺段切除术可获得良好的短期疗效,术后恢复迅速,对肺功能影响小,有助于提高患者术后生活质量。