Suppr超能文献

使用不同注射器系统评估牙科学生在韧带内麻醉中的学习曲线:一项前瞻性交叉研究。

Evaluation of dental students' learning curve in intraligamentary anesthesia using different syringe systems: A prospective crossover study.

作者信息

Luhrenberg Philipp, Renders Mirjam, Heimes Diana, Hollinderbäumer Anke, Kaya Sebahat, Kyyak Solomiya, Schröger Saskia V, Thiem Daniel G E, Wagner Helen, Kämmerer Peer W

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 2025 Apr;89(4):493-503. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13754. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: This prospective crossover preclinical trial aimed to evaluate the learning curve of dental students in successfully administering intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) using three different syringe systems.

METHODS

Dental students performed ILA using three devices in two separate sessions, each targeting mandibular and/or maxillary premolars. The devices included two manual systems (pistol-type and lever-based) and one computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). The primary research parameter was the success rate of anesthesia, defined as the percentage of successful ILA administrations confirmed by a negative response to a cold test. Secondary parameters included pain experienced during needle penetration and injection, students' self-reported levels of mental tension and handling of the syringes, and any potential side effects.

RESULTS

A total of 110 students performed ILA on 599 teeth during the study period. When comparing the CCLAD system to the manual syringes, the CCLAD system exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate in the first session (92.5% vs. 77.4%; p < 0.001), potentially due to its precise control of anesthetic flow and pressure, which likely facilitated more effective anesthetic delivery. However, when examining the individual manual techniques, no significant difference was found between the pistol-type manual and the CCLAD system (p = 0.66). All techniques' success rate increased from the first to the second session (80.4% vs. 86.9%; p = 0.0357). Additionally, penetration pain demonstrated a significant decrease across all techniques (p < 0.01). Notably, students' anxiety levels decreased, and self-assurance increased significantly over the sessions. Undesired reversible side effects were documented in 10.9% of cases.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that repeated practice of ILA, particularly with different syringe systems, enhances anesthetic success and psychological readiness for patient interaction. Additional training sessions may further improve proficiency.

摘要

目的/目标:这项前瞻性交叉临床前试验旨在评估牙科学生使用三种不同注射器系统成功实施牙周膜内麻醉(ILA)的学习曲线。

方法

牙科学生在两个不同的时间段使用三种器械进行ILA,每次针对下颌和/或上颌前磨牙。这些器械包括两种手动系统(手枪式和杠杆式)和一种计算机控制局部麻醉给药系统(CCLAD)。主要研究参数是麻醉成功率,定义为冷测试阴性反应确认的ILA成功给药百分比。次要参数包括针刺入和注射过程中经历的疼痛、学生自我报告的精神紧张程度和注射器操作情况,以及任何潜在的副作用。

结果

在研究期间,共有110名学生对599颗牙齿进行了ILA。将CCLAD系统与手动注射器进行比较时,CCLAD系统在第一阶段的总体成功率显著更高(92.5%对77.4%;p<0.001),这可能是由于其对麻醉剂流量和压力的精确控制,这可能有助于更有效地给药。然而,在检查个体手动技术时,手枪式手动系统和CCLAD系统之间没有发现显著差异(p=0.66)。所有技术的成功率从第一阶段到第二阶段都有所提高(80.4%对86.9%;p=0.0357)。此外,所有技术的穿刺疼痛都显著降低(p<0.01)。值得注意的是,在整个时间段内,学生的焦虑水平下降,自信心显著提高。10.9%的病例记录了不期望的可逆副作用。

结论

这些发现表明,反复练习ILA,尤其是使用不同的注射器系统,可提高麻醉成功率和与患者互动的心理准备。额外的培训课程可能会进一步提高熟练程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e33/12004350/02b6c943d5ac/JDD-89-493-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验