Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗生物类似药与原研药联合化疗用于非小细胞肺癌的生存及安全性回顾性分析

Retrospective analysis of survival and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original drug combination chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Xinyi, Chu Xiaofei, Wang Jun, Gu Wenjing, Fu Xiaoyan, Zhang Jing, Wang Congying, Han Qinghui, Zhou Jing, Zhang Yongjing, Liu Xiaoyan

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Baotou Cancer Hospital, Baotou, China.

Pharmacy Department, The Fourth Hospital of Baotou, Baotou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 15;14:1437762. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1437762. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The advent of bevacizumab has considerably transformed the therapeutic landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients devoid of specific genetic mutations. A pivotal milestone has been reached with the recent approval of a bevacizumab biosimilar, following rigorous phase III clinical investigations, poised to augment NSCLC therapeutic strategies.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis encompasses a large-scale study conducted between January 2021 and December 2023, involving 1058 NSCLC patients (metastatic or locally advanced stages). The research design entailed a comparative assessment of the safety and efficacy profiles of combined therapies using the original bevacizumab and its biosimilar, adhering to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Adverse event grading was standardized using the National Cancer Institute's CTCAE v5.0.

RESULTS

Notably, the biosimilar demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 29.79% in 606 patients, closely paralleling the 27.41% ORR observed in 452 patients receiving the original drug, with insignificant risk differences (-0.03) and a risk ratio of 0.987, affirming equivalence. Progression-free survival (PFS) was influenced by radiation status, treatment lines, and regimen combinations, while dosage intensity and genetic factors had negligible impacts. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was slightly higher in the biosimilar group (75.11%) versus the original drug group (72.78%), with grade 3 or more severe TEAEs occurring in 23.6% and 18.5% of patients, respectively (Detailed criteria for the definition and assessment of TEAEs have been added to the Methods section, including the use of the National Cancer Institute's CTCAE v5.0 for grading).

CONCLUSIONS

The study affirms that bevacizumab biosimilars offer equivalent therapeutic efficacy and a similar safety profile to the originator product in the management of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. The tolerability of the toxicity profile, coupled with the absence of unforeseen adverse reactions, underscores the viability of biosimilar bevacizumab as a valuable addition to NSCLC treatment regimens. These findings also imply potential benefits for a broader patient population beyond clinical trial confines through the adoption of biosimilar beta-adrenergic blocking agents.

摘要

引言

贝伐单抗的出现极大地改变了无特定基因突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗格局。在经过严格的III期临床研究后,一种贝伐单抗生物类似药最近获得批准,这是一个关键的里程碑,有望增强NSCLC的治疗策略。

方法

这项回顾性分析涵盖了2021年1月至2023年12月期间进行的一项大规模研究,涉及1058例NSCLC患者(转移性或局部晚期阶段)。研究设计要求根据RECIST v1.1标准对使用原研贝伐单抗及其生物类似药的联合治疗的安全性和疗效进行比较评估。不良事件分级使用美国国立癌症研究所的CTCAE v5.0进行标准化。

结果

值得注意的是,该生物类似药在606例患者中的客观缓解率(ORR)为29.79%,与452例接受原研药治疗的患者中观察到的27.41%的ORR非常接近,风险差异不显著(-0.03),风险比为0.987,确认了等效性。无进展生存期(PFS)受放疗状态、治疗线数和方案组合的影响,而剂量强度和基因因素的影响可忽略不计。生物类似药组治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率略高于原研药组(75.11%对72.78%),3级或更严重的TEAE分别发生在23.6%和18.5%的患者中(TEAE的定义和评估的详细标准已添加到方法部分,包括使用美国国立癌症研究所的CTCAE v5.0进行分级)。

结论

该研究证实,在局部晚期或转移性NSCLC的治疗中,贝伐单抗生物类似药与原研产品具有等效的治疗效果和相似的安全性。毒性特征的耐受性,加上没有不可预见的不良反应,强调了生物类似药贝伐单抗作为NSCLC治疗方案中有价值补充的可行性。这些发现还意味着,通过采用生物类似的β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂,对于临床试验范围之外的更广泛患者群体可能有潜在益处。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies in China: A patent review.中国的生物类似药单克隆抗体:专利审查。
Bioengineered. 2022 Jun;13(6):14503-14518. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2090206.
8
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验