Guo Zijin, Cheng Zhipeng, Zhang Shaohan, Zhu Hongkai, Zhao Leicheng, Baqar Mujtaba, Wang Lei, Sun Hongwen
MOE Key Laboratory of Pollution Processes and Environmental Criteria, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300350, China.
School of Environment, Key Laboratory for Yellow River and Huai River Water Environment and Pollution Control, Ministry of Education, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Environ Health (Wash). 2024 Feb 19;2(5):278-289. doi: 10.1021/envhealth.3c00205. eCollection 2024 May 17.
Aromatic amine antioxidants (AAs), extensively used in rubber products, and their ozone-photolyzed product -phenylenediamine quinones (PPD-Qs) were found to be pervasive in various environments and with potential ecological and health risks. The relationship between external and internal exposure to these contaminants and their exposure risks to the general population remain poorly explored. Herein, dust-handwipe-urine samples ( = 97 pairs) from families in Tianjin, China was collected for analyzing 20 AAs and 6 PPD-Qs (including self-synthesized emerging PPD-Qs). The median concentration of ∑AAs (1310 ng/g, 354 ng/m, and 18.5 ng/mL, respectively) and ∑PPD-Qs (1645 ng/g, 3913 ng/m and 3.76 ng/mL, respectively) in dust, handwipe, and urine samples indicated a non-negligible contamination of AAs and PPD-Qs in indoor environment. Notably, emerging DPPD-Q and DNPD-Q (oxidation products of DPPD and DNPD, respectively) were prominent, accounting for >90% of PPD-Qs. The correlation analysis and estimated daily intake (EDI) assessments indicated that neither dust ingestion nor dermal exposure may be the primary source of internal exposure to AAs and PPD-Qs in the general population, and other exposure pathways (e.g., diet and inhalation) may exist. HepG2 cell experiments demonstrated that both PPD-Qs and PPDs may have potential exposure risk of hepatotoxicity.
芳香胺抗氧化剂(AAs)广泛应用于橡胶制品中,其臭氧光解产物——苯二胺醌(PPD-Qs)被发现广泛存在于各种环境中,并具有潜在的生态和健康风险。这些污染物的外部暴露与内部暴露之间的关系以及它们对普通人群的暴露风险仍未得到充分研究。在此,收集了中国天津家庭的灰尘-手擦拭-尿液样本(n = 97对),用于分析20种AAs和6种PPD-Qs(包括自行合成的新型PPD-Qs)。灰尘、手擦拭物和尿液样本中∑AAs(分别为1310 ng/g、354 ng/m³和18.5 ng/mL)和∑PPD-Qs(分别为1645 ng/g、3913 ng/m³和3.76 ng/mL)的中位数浓度表明室内环境中AAs和PPD-Qs的污染不可忽视。值得注意的是,新型DPPD-Q和DNPD-Q(分别为DPPD和DNPD的氧化产物)含量突出,占PPD-Qs的比例>90%。相关性分析和估计每日摄入量(EDI)评估表明,灰尘摄入和皮肤接触都不太可能是普通人群内部暴露于AAs和PPD-Qs的主要来源,可能存在其他暴露途径(如饮食和吸入)。HepG2细胞实验表明,PPD-Qs和PPDs都可能具有肝毒性的潜在暴露风险。