• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

V2型特发性三叉神经痛患者微血管减压术与经皮球囊压迫术疗效比较

Comparison of microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression efficacy in patients with V2 idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.

作者信息

Ji Ye, Wang Junwu

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1406602. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1406602. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1406602
PMID:39474365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11518807/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare the efficacy and long-term prognosis of microvascular decompression (MVD) versus percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in patients with idiopathic V2 (maxillary branch) trigeminal neuralgia.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical information and follow-up data of patients who underwent surgical treatment for V2 idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia from January 2020 to January 2023. A total of 58 patients were included in the MVD group and 99 in the PBC group. All surgeries were performed by two physicians at the same center, with follow-up conducted by a separate, trained researcher. We compared the initial versus 12-month postoperative pain relief rates (scored using the BNI), surgical complications, and described pain relief rates after long-term follow-up in both groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 157 patients (MVD 58, PBC 99). The median age of patients in the MVD group was lower than that in the PBC group (58 [51-65] vs. 63 [58-69],  = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain relief rates initially after surgery and at 12 months ( = 0.521,  = 0.713). However, the MVD group had significantly better outcomes regarding postoperative facial numbness ( < 0.0001), masticatory weakness ( = 0.0017), and other complications ( = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MVD provided a longer duration of pain relief than PBC ( = 0.0323), with most recurrences in both groups occurring within 1-2 years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in significant pain relief rates between the two groups initially after surgery and at 12 months. However, the MVD group showed a clear advantage over PBC regarding postoperative facial numbness, masticatory weakness, and other complications; moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that MVD offers a longer duration of pain relief for patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较微血管减压术(MVD)与经皮球囊压迫术(PBC)治疗特发性V2(上颌支)三叉神经痛患者的疗效及长期预后。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2020年1月至2023年1月接受V2特发性三叉神经痛手术治疗患者的临床信息和随访数据。MVD组纳入58例患者,PBC组纳入99例患者。所有手术均由同一中心的两名医生进行,由另一名经过培训的研究人员进行随访。我们比较了术后初始与12个月时的疼痛缓解率(使用BNI评分)、手术并发症,并使用Kaplan-Meier分析描述了两组长期随访后的疼痛缓解率。

结果

该研究共纳入157例患者(MVD组58例,PBC组99例)。MVD组患者的中位年龄低于PBC组(58[51 - 65]岁 vs. 63[58 - 69]岁,P = 0.002)。两组术后初始及12个月时的疼痛缓解率无显著差异(P = 0.521,P = 0.713)。然而,MVD组在术后面部麻木(P < 0.0001)、咀嚼肌无力(P = 0.0017)及其他并发症(P = 0.04)方面的结局明显更好。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,MVD的疼痛缓解持续时间比PBC长(P = 0.0323),两组大多数复发发生在术后1 - 2年内。

结论

两组术后初始及12个月时的显著疼痛缓解率无显著差异。然而,MVD组在术后面部麻木、咀嚼肌无力及其他并发症方面比PBC组具有明显优势;此外,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,MVD为患者提供了更长的疼痛缓解持续时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/5e69ca1fe6db/fneur-15-1406602-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/58cd067777de/fneur-15-1406602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/fa9dde81eeb2/fneur-15-1406602-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/b47c18f79f15/fneur-15-1406602-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/5e69ca1fe6db/fneur-15-1406602-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/58cd067777de/fneur-15-1406602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/fa9dde81eeb2/fneur-15-1406602-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/b47c18f79f15/fneur-15-1406602-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3270/11518807/5e69ca1fe6db/fneur-15-1406602-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression efficacy in patients with V2 idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia.V2型特发性三叉神经痛患者微血管减压术与经皮球囊压迫术疗效比较
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1406602. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1406602. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.比较首次微血管减压术与经皮手术治疗三叉神经痛:长期结果和预后因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jun;163(6):1623-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and microvascular decompression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.经皮球囊压迫术与微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1451-1455. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.8049.
4
Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of trigeminal ganglion for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD).微血管减压术(MVD)后复发性三叉神经痛的三叉神经节经皮球囊压迫术(PBC)
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Dec;184(4):745-51. doi: 10.1007/s11845-014-1163-7. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
5
Analysis of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Percutaneous Balloon Double Compression for the Treatment of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia.经皮球囊双重压迫治疗复发性三叉神经痛的疗效分析。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):35-41.
6
Outcomes of Treatment for Elderly Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: Percutaneous Balloon Compression Versus Microvascular Decompression.老年三叉神经痛患者的治疗结果:经皮球囊压迫与微血管减压术比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct;31(7):e685-e688. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006544.
7
Prospective Comparison of Redo Microvascular Decompression and Percutaneous Balloon Compression as Primary Surgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia.再次微血管减压术与经皮球囊压迫术作为复发性三叉神经痛初次手术的前瞻性比较
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Nov;61(6):747-752. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0196. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
8
Prospective comparison of long-term pain relief rates after first-time microvascular decompression and stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.首次微血管减压术与立体定向放射外科治疗三叉神经痛后长期疼痛缓解率的前瞻性比较。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;128(1):68-77. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS16149. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Is percutaneous balloon compression better than microvascular decompression to treat trigeminal neuralgia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮球囊压迫术与微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Mar;109:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
10
Balloon Pressure and Clinical Effectiveness of Percutaneous Microballoon Compression in the Treatment of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia.球囊压迫术治疗原发性三叉神经痛的球囊压力与临床疗效。
Pain Physician. 2024 Mar;27(3):E345-E353.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) in improving physical function and quality of life in trigeminal neuralgia: a retrospective study.经皮球囊压迫术(PBC)改善三叉神经痛患者身体功能和生活质量的有效性:一项回顾性研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Dec;165(12):3905-3912. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05823-z. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
2
Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and microvascular decompression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.经皮球囊压迫术与微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1451-1455. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.8049.
3
Long-term pain outcomes in trigeminal neuralgia patients with concomitant continuous pain: a comparison of first-time microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression.
伴有持续性疼痛的三叉神经痛患者的长期疼痛结局:首次微血管减压术与经皮球囊压迫术的比较
Neurosurg Rev. 2023 Jul 24;46(1):183. doi: 10.1007/s10143-023-02089-y.
4
Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia - a prospective study of 115 patients.微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛——115 例前瞻性研究。
J Headache Pain. 2022 Nov 19;23(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01520-x.
5
Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression versus percutaneous balloon compression in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微血管减压术与经皮球囊压迫术治疗三叉神经痛的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;11(4):1391-1400. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3901.
6
Comparison of first-time microvascular decompression with percutaneous surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors.比较首次微血管减压术与经皮手术治疗三叉神经痛:长期结果和预后因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jun;163(6):1623-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04793-4. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Neurovascular contact plays no role in trigeminal neuralgia secondary to multiple sclerosis.神经血管接触在多发性硬化继发三叉神经痛中不起作用。
Cephalalgia. 2021 Apr;41(5):593-603. doi: 10.1177/0333102420974356. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Outcomes of Treatment for Elderly Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia: Percutaneous Balloon Compression Versus Microvascular Decompression.老年三叉神经痛患者的治疗结果:经皮球囊压迫与微血管减压术比较。
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct;31(7):e685-e688. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006544.
9
Prognosis Comparison of Different Branches of Trigeminal Neuralgia.三叉神经痛不同分支的预后比较。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jan;133:e1-e5. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.115. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
10
Significance of degree of neurovascular compression in surgery for trigeminal neuralgia.神经血管压迫程度在三叉神经痛手术中的意义
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jun 14;133(2):411-416. doi: 10.3171/2019.3.JNS183174. Print 2020 Aug 1.