• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在中国接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素icodec与每日一次甘精胰岛素的成本-效用分析。

Cost-utility analysis of once-weekly insulin icodec and once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy in China.

作者信息

Dai Nan, Su Xiaorong, Wang Yong

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan;27(1):377-386. doi: 10.1111/dom.16031. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/dom.16031
PMID:39474644
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to explore the rational pricing range for the once-weekly administration of insulin icodec in the treatment of type 2 diabetes patients in China who have already received basal insulin therapy.

METHODS

The data foundation of this study originates from the ONWARDS 4 clinical trial and research materials on Chinese type 2 diabetes patients. By comprehensively applying cost-utility analysis methods and binary search techniques, the appropriate price positioning of insulin icodec was determined from the perspective of China's healthcare system.

RESULTS

In the long-term treatment simulation, we found that insulin icodec and insulin glargine performed similarly in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), with 10.15 and 10.07 years, respectively. Although the annual cost of insulin icodec was initially assumed to be equivalent to that of insulin glargine, in-depth analysis revealed that insulin icodec may have higher cost-effectiveness potential. Further price sensitivity analysis indicated that the reasonable cost range of insulin icodec lies between $851.95 and $1358.25. After fine-tuning through univariate sensitivity analysis, this cost range was revised to $784.90 to $1145.96, a conclusion that was robustly validated in subsequent probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario simulations.

CONCLUSION

The conclusion drawn from this study is that, with insulin glargine as the cost reference, the economic cost of insulin icodec for Chinese type 2 diabetes patients is expected to range from $784.90 to $1145.96, providing a reference basis for clinical decision-making and healthcare policy formulation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探索在中国已接受基础胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次注射icodec胰岛素的合理定价范围。

方法

本研究的数据基础源自ONWARDS 4临床试验及中国2型糖尿病患者的研究资料。通过综合应用成本-效用分析方法和二分搜索技术,从中国医疗体系的角度确定icodec胰岛素的合适价格定位。

结果

在长期治疗模拟中,我们发现icodec胰岛素和甘精胰岛素在质量调整生命年(QALY)方面表现相似,分别为10.15年和10.07年。尽管最初假设icodec胰岛素的年成本与甘精胰岛素相当,但深入分析表明icodec胰岛素可能具有更高的成本效益潜力。进一步的价格敏感性分析表明,icodec胰岛素的合理成本范围在851.95美元至1358.25美元之间。通过单因素敏感性分析进行微调后,该成本范围修订为784.90美元至1145.96美元,这一结论在随后的概率敏感性分析和情景模拟中得到了有力验证。

结论

本研究得出的结论是,以甘精胰岛素为成本参考,中国2型糖尿病患者使用icodec胰岛素的经济成本预计在784.90美元至1145.96美元之间,为临床决策和医疗政策制定提供了参考依据。

相似文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of once-weekly insulin icodec and once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving basal-bolus insulin therapy in China.在中国接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素icodec与每日一次甘精胰岛素的成本-效用分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan;27(1):377-386. doi: 10.1111/dom.16031. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Cost-utility analysis and drug pricing of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin degludec for type 2 diabetes patients treated with basal insulin in China.在中国接受基础胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素 icodec 与每日一次胰岛素地特胰岛素的成本-效用分析和药物定价。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26(12):5995-6006. doi: 10.1111/dom.15973. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Continuous glucose monitoring-based metrics and the duration of hypoglycaemia events with once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes: an exploratory analysis of ONWARDS 1.基于连续血糖监测的指标与每周一次icodec 胰岛素和每日一次甘精 U100 胰岛素治疗初诊 2 型糖尿病患者的低血糖事件持续时间:ONWARDS 1 的探索性分析。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Nov;12(11):799-810. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00220-1. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
4
Improved treatment satisfaction with once-weekly insulin icodec compared with once-daily basal insulin in individuals with type 2 diabetes: An analysis of patient-reported outcomes and participant interviews from ONWARDS 2 and 5 and a physician survey from ONWARDS 1.与每日一次基础胰岛素相比,每周一次胰岛素icodec 可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗满意度:来自 ONWARDS 2 和 5 的患者报告结局分析和参与者访谈,以及来自 ONWARDS 1 的医生调查。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Nov;217:111885. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111885. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial.在接受基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中转换使用每周一次胰岛素德谷胰岛素与每日一次胰岛素甘精 U100:一项 3a 期、随机、开放标签、多中心、以目标为导向、非劣效性试验(ONWARDS 4)。
Lancet. 2023 Jun 10;401(10392):1929-1940. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00520-2. Epub 2023 May 5.
6
Cost-effectiveness of exenatide twice daily vs insulin glargine as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes in China.在中国 2 型糖尿病患者中,每日两次艾塞那肽与甘精胰岛素作为口服降糖药的附加疗法的成本效益比较。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Dec;19(12):1688-1697. doi: 10.1111/dom.12991. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily basal insulin in Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: A subgroup analysis of the ONWARDS 1, 2 and 4 trials.在日本 2 型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素 icodec 与每日一次基础胰岛素的疗效和安全性:ONWARDS 1、2 和 4 项试验的亚组分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Dec;26(12):5882-5895. doi: 10.1111/dom.15960. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Weekly Icodec versus Daily Glargine U100 in Type 2 Diabetes without Previous Insulin.每周一次伊克多昔与每日一次甘精 U100 在无前期胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病中的应用比较。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 27;389(4):297-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303208. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
9
Clinical Outcomes With Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Versus Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in Insulin-Naïve and Previously Insulin-Treated Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.在既往未使用胰岛素和既往接受胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,每周一次胰岛素icodec与每日一次甘精胰岛素U100的临床结局比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024 May;7(3):e00480. doi: 10.1002/edm2.480.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of exenatide twice daily (BID) vs insulin glargine once daily (QD) as add-on therapy in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by oral therapies.在中国口服治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者中,每日两次注射艾塞那肽与每日一次注射甘精胰岛素作为附加治疗的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2015;18(11):974-89. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1067622. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences, Expectations and Attitudes on Basal Insulin from Patient-Physician-Payer Perspective: A Multi-stakeholder Survey by the Italian Diabetes Society (ITA4P Study).从患者-医生-支付方角度看对基础胰岛素的偏好、期望和态度:意大利糖尿病学会的多利益相关方调查(ITA4P研究)
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Jun;16(6):1241-1254. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01729-4. Epub 2025 Mar 28.