• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Response to "Letter to the Editor concerning 'The Calf Raise App shows good concurrent validity compared with a linear encoder in measuring total concentric work': Let us not compare apples to oranges".

作者信息

Ashnai Farshad, Lindskog Jakob, Brorsson Annelie, Nilsson Helander Katarina, Beischer Susanne

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, The Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Sportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):765-766. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12521. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1002/ksa.12521
PMID:39474864
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Response to "Letter to the Editor concerning 'The Calf Raise App shows good concurrent validity compared with a linear encoder in measuring total concentric work': Let us not compare apples to oranges".对“致编辑的信：关于‘与线性编码器相比，提踵训练应用程序在测量总向心功方面具有良好的同时效度’：我们不要将苹果与橙子作比较”的回复
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):765-766. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12521. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Letter to the Editor concerning 'The Calf Raise App shows good concurrent validity compared with a linear encoder in measuring total concentric work': Let's not compare apples to oranges.致编辑的信，关于“与线性编码器相比，提踵训练器在测量总向心功方面具有良好的同时效度”：咱们别把风马牛不相及的事物作比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):760-764. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12515. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
The Calf Raise App shows good concurrent validity compared with a linear encoder in measuring total concentric work.《跟腱提升应用程序》在测量总向心工作时，与线性编码器相比，具有较好的同时效度。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Aug;32(8):2170-2177. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12190. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
4
Validity of the ® app for resistance training monitoring.用于阻力训练监测的®应用程序的有效性。
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 7;7:e7372. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7372. eCollection 2019.
5
Letter to the Editor: Are we comparing apples with oranges?致编辑的信：我们是在将苹果与橙子作比较吗？
Hepatology. 2024 Nov 1;80(5):E63-E64. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000799. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
6
Letter to the Editor. The ancient "apples and oranges" conundrum: a call for methodological precision.致编辑的信。古老的“苹果与橙子”难题：对方法准确性的呼吁。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):765-768. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE161185. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
7
Reply to the Letter to the Editor: "Mixing Apples and Oranges in Assessing Outcomes of Repetitive Transcranial Stimulation Meta-Analyses".致编辑的信的回复：“在评估重复经颅磁刺激荟萃分析结果时将苹果与橙子混为一谈”
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(2):108. doi: 10.1159/000505133. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
8
In Reply to the Letter to the Editor "Apples and Oranges: Proper Comparison of Costs - Endonasal vs. Transnasal".致编辑的信《苹果与橙子：成本的恰当比较——鼻内入路与经鼻入路》的回复
World Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;106:986-987. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.056.
9
Concurrent validity and reliability of a mobile iOS application used to assess calf raise test kinematics.一款用于评估提踵测试运动学的移动iOS应用程序的同时效度和信度。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023 Feb;63:102711. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102711. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Response to "Letter to the Editor concerning 'Evidence-based research in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation-Why new studies should rely on earlier work'".
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Feb;33(2):769-770. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12498. Epub 2024 Nov 12.