Pasquer Hélène, Kiladjian Jean-Jacques, Benajiba Lina
Centre d'Investigations Cliniques, INSERM CIC 1427, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris Cité, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
INSERM UMR 944, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
Blood. 2025 Jan 16;145(3):257-276. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024025459.
:ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematologic malignancies that are caused by the proliferation of myeloid cells that harbor a JAK-STAT pathway activating driver mutation. MPN management recommendations are based on the evaluation of different risks to prevent disease evolution-associated events while preserving patients' quality of life. Such risks can be common across all MPNs or specific to each subtype (polycythemia vera [PV], essential thrombocythemia [ET], prefibrotic myelofibrosis [MF], and primary MF). Patients with MF harbor the worse prognosis, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment at the expense of a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, accurate scoring systems to estimate overall survival are crucial for the management of patients with MF and the selection for HSCT. In PV and ET, the prediction of vascular events is prioritized given their higher incidence and related morbidity and mortality. Finally, quality of life evaluation is important for all subtypes. To predict these risks and adapt MPN therapeutic strategies, clinical risk scores have been developed over the past decades and more recently have incorporated molecular risk factors for more accurate risk stratification. The large number of scoring systems available, combined with disease heterogeneity and the necessity to predict diverse outcomes, make it difficult for clinicians to choose the most appropriate score to evaluate their patients' risk in 2024. Here, we provide an overview of MPN disease evolution-associated event incidence and conduct an exhaustive comparative review of the scoring systems currently available for each risk. Finally, we propose an algorithm for the use of these scores in clinical practice in each MPN subtype.
:ABL1 阴性骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)是克隆性血液系统恶性肿瘤,由携带 JAK-STAT 通路激活驱动突变的髓系细胞增殖引起。MPN 的管理建议基于对不同风险的评估,以预防与疾病进展相关的事件,同时保持患者的生活质量。这些风险在所有 MPN 中可能是常见的,也可能是每种亚型(真性红细胞增多症 [PV]、原发性血小板增多症 [ET]、纤维化前骨髓纤维化 [MF] 和原发性 MF)所特有的。MF 患者预后较差,造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是唯一的治愈性治疗方法,但会有较高的发病率和死亡率。因此,准确的评分系统对于评估 MF 患者的总生存期以及选择 HSCT 至关重要。在 PV 和 ET 中,鉴于血管事件的较高发生率以及相关的发病率和死亡率,对其预测更为重要。最后,生活质量评估对所有亚型都很重要。为了预测这些风险并调整 MPN 的治疗策略,则在过去几十年中开发了临床风险评分,最近又纳入了分子风险因素以进行更准确的风险分层。现有的大量评分系统,加上疾病的异质性以及预测多种结果的必要性,使得临床医生在 2024 年难以选择最合适的评分来评估患者的风险。在此,我们概述了 MPN 疾病进展相关事件的发生率,并对目前针对每种风险的可用评分系统进行了详尽的比较综述。最后,我们提出了一种算法,用于在每种 MPN 亚型的临床实践中使用这些评分。