Department of Periodontology, Dental Research Division, Guarulhos University, Praça Tereza Cristina, 88 - Centro, Guarulhos, São Paulo 07023-070, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental SchoolUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). Av. Limeira, 901, Piracicaba, São Paulo 13414-903, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2024 Oct 25;35:e246110. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202406110. eCollection 2024.
Nonsurgical therapies have been recommended and employed as a less invasive and cost-effective modality in managing periodontitis. In this context, different therapeutic protocols have been tested in the last decades. Therefore, mapping the scientific trends and patterns provides critical insights into the state of research in the field, which has not been explored for overall nonsurgical periodontitis treatment studies. Articles from 2001 to 2020 were retrieved from the Web of Science database using appropriate terms and keywords. Article selection and data extraction were performed by calibrated examiners. All articles focusing on nonsurgical periodontitis treatment were included. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. 1,519 articles were included. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were the most used design (44.1%), and professional biofilm control was the topic most studied (35.6%). Europe published the most significant number of articles (41.1%). The USA was the country that collaborated more with other countries. Asia (p<0.001), South America (p=0.004), and Oceania/Africa (p=0.016) showed a lower chance to have international collaboration. Studies from North America were more likely to be RCTs than studies from Europe (p=0.050); studies focusing on professional biofilm control (p<0.001) and other topics (p<0.001) were less likely to be evaluated by RCTs. The nonsurgical periodontitis treatment field mainly conducted RCTs, and the topic most explored by all studies was professional biofilm control. International collaboration and conduct of RCTs in this field occurred mainly among high-income countries. Decentralizing scientific resources, making integrative connections globally, and evaluating new topics may improve evidence-based periodontology.
非手术治疗方法作为一种侵袭性较小且具有成本效益的方法,已被推荐并应用于牙周炎的治疗。在这种情况下,过去几十年已经测试了不同的治疗方案。因此,绘制科学趋势和模式图可以为该领域的研究现状提供重要的见解,但尚未对整体非手术牙周炎治疗研究进行探索。从 Web of Science 数据库中检索了 2001 年至 2020 年的文章,使用了适当的术语和关键词。由经过校准的检查人员进行文章选择和数据提取。所有关注非手术牙周炎治疗的文章都被纳入研究。进行了描述性、双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。共纳入 1519 篇文章。随机临床试验 (RCT) 是最常用的设计 (44.1%),专业生物膜控制是研究最多的主题 (35.6%)。欧洲发表的文章数量最多 (41.1%)。美国与其他国家合作最多。亚洲 (p<0.001)、南美洲 (p=0.004) 和大洋洲/非洲 (p=0.016) 与国际合作的机会较低。与欧洲相比,北美的研究更有可能进行 RCT (p=0.050);更有可能进行 RCT 的研究主题是专业生物膜控制 (p<0.001) 和其他主题 (p<0.001)。非手术牙周炎治疗领域主要进行 RCT,所有研究中探索最多的主题是专业生物膜控制。该领域的国际合作和 RCT 的开展主要发生在高收入国家。分散科学资源、在全球范围内建立综合联系以及评估新主题可能会改善循证牙周病学。