• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经 70 度内镜下经口腔刮除术、微动力系统腺样体切除术和内镜经口低温消融术治疗腺样体肥大的疗效比较。

Comparative outcomes of microdebrider adenoidectomy, curettage adenoidectomy through oral cavity under 70 endoscope, and endoscopic transoral low-temperature ablation for adenoid hypertrophy.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Beilun People's Hospital, Beilun District, Ningbo, 315800, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Beilun People's Hospital, Beilun District, Ningbo, 315800, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;186:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112143. Epub 2024 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112143
PMID:39476644
Abstract

AIM

We aimed to compare the effects of microdebrider adenoidectomy, curettage adenoidectomy through oral cavity under 70°endoscope, and endoscopic transoral low-temperature ablation on adenoid hypertrophy.

METHODS

A total of 180 children suffering from adenoid hypertrophy hospitalized during November 2019 and November 2023 were allocated to group A (microdebrider adenoidectomy, n = 65), group B (curettage adenoidectomy through oral cavity under 70° nasal endoscope, n = 54), and group C (nasal endoscopic transoral low-temperature adenoid ablation, n = 61). The operation data (operation time and bleeding amount), pain score, postoperative recovery, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The operation time of group A was significantly shorter than those of other two groups, while group C had a significantly smaller bleeding amount than those of other two groups (P < 0.05). An incidence rate of secondary bleeding at 6.15 % was detected in group A, without other complications. Group B had an adenoid residual rate of 35.19 % and a recurrence rate of 14.81 %, significantly exceeding those of other two groups (P < 0.05). The soft palate injury rate was 24.59 % in group C, which was raised significantly compared with those of other two groups (P < 0.05). In comparison to other two groups, significant increases in postoperative pain score and pain duration were detected in Group C (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in the effective rate among the three methods. Nasal endoscopic transoral low-temperature adenoid ablation is recommended as the first choice because of small bleeding amount, few postoperative residuals, and low recurrence rate, but it poses high requirements on the operation of doctors.

摘要

目的

比较分析电动吸切器腺样体切除术、70°鼻内镜经口腔腺样体刮除术与内镜下经口低温消融术治疗腺样体肥大的效果。

方法

选取 2019 年 11 月至 2023 年 11 月期间我院收治的 180 例腺样体肥大患儿,分为 A 组(电动吸切器腺样体切除术,n=65)、B 组(70°鼻内镜经口腔腺样体刮除术,n=54)和 C 组(内镜下经口低温消融术,n=61)。比较三组患儿的手术相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量)、疼痛评分、术后恢复情况和并发症。

结果

A 组手术时间显著短于其他两组,术中出血量显著少于其他两组(P<0.05)。A 组有 1 例(1.54%)患儿出现继发性出血,无其他并发症。B 组患儿的腺样体残留率和复发率分别为 35.19%、14.81%,显著高于其他两组(P<0.05)。C 组软腭损伤发生率为 24.59%,显著高于其他两组(P<0.05)。与其他两组相比,C 组患儿术后疼痛评分和疼痛持续时间均显著升高(P<0.05)。

结论

三种方法的有效率无显著差异。鼻内镜下经口低温消融术出血量少、术后残留少、复发率低,推荐作为首选,但对术者操作要求较高。

相似文献

1
Comparative outcomes of microdebrider adenoidectomy, curettage adenoidectomy through oral cavity under 70 endoscope, and endoscopic transoral low-temperature ablation for adenoid hypertrophy.经 70 度内镜下经口腔刮除术、微动力系统腺样体切除术和内镜经口低温消融术治疗腺样体肥大的疗效比较。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;186:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112143. Epub 2024 Oct 20.
2
Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy.经口动力辅助内镜腺样体切除术与刮除腺样体切除术的比较。
Adv Ther. 2012 Aug;29(8):708-21. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0036-6. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy.我们的做法:传统刮匙与电动辅助内镜下腺样体切除术相结合的方法。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):556-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294377.
4
Trans-oral endoscopic assisted radio-frequency for adenoid ablation; A randomized prospective comparative clinical study.经口内镜辅助射频治疗腺样体消融术:一项随机前瞻性对照临床研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2021 Aug;48(4):710-717. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
Endoscopic nasopharyngeal exploration at the end of conventional curettage adenoidectomy.经传统腺样体切除术刮除术末端行内镜鼻咽探查。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Mar;269(3):1037-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-011-1739-z. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
6
Endoscopic assisted powered adenoidectomy versus conventional adenoidectomy - a randomised controlled trial.内镜辅助动力腺样体切除术与传统腺样体切除术的随机对照试验
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Apr;133(4):289-293. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000550.
7
Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study.经鼻与经口微动力系统联合腺样体切除术切除残留的对比:一项随机前瞻性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;278(3):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06385-x. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Comparison of two different adenoidectomy techniques with special emphasize on postoperative nasal mucociliary clearance rates: coblation technique vs. cold curettage.两种不同腺样体切除术技术的比较,特别强调术后鼻黏膜纤毛清除率:低温等离子消融技术与冷刮除术。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;77(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.11.033. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
9
Paediatric adenoidectomy: endoscopic coblation technique compared to cold curettage.小儿腺样体切除术:内镜下等离子刀与冷器械切除的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2012 Apr;32(2):124-9.
10
A comparative study of two adenoidectomy technics for efficacy and safety: Conventional curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy.两种腺样体切除术技术的疗效和安全性比较研究:传统刮除腺样体切除术与内镜下微动力系统切除术的比较。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;44(4):103807. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103807. Epub 2023 Mar 9.