• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国南方湿润地区历史干旱期的生态和植被响应。

Ecological and vegetation responses in a humid region in southern China during a historic drought.

机构信息

School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.

The Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute, Guangzhou 510611, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:122986. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122986. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122986
PMID:39476672
Abstract

Climate change has triggered more frequent drought occurrence, which can have devastating impacts on the ecosystem functions. Studies on vegetation behavior during droughts have mainly focused on arid/semi-arid regions, yet the ecological and vegetation responses during drought in humid regions remain unclear. Here we systematically evaluated the evolution of the historic drought occurred in the humid Pearl River Basin in 2021 and quantified the vegetation responses using a multitude of vegetation indicators. Analyses showed that the East River Basin and North River Basin were the most severely hit by drought, which enhanced surface temperature and evapotranspiration, and caused soil moisture and terrestrial water storage deficits. Mean vegetation response time was shorter based on solar-induced fluorescence (SIF, 2.7 months) and the water use efficiency (WUE, 2.8 months), followed by the gross primary productivity (GPP, 3.2 months), and longer using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI, 4.2 months) and the vegetation optical depth (VOD, 5.0 months). By contrast, over 90% of the ecosystems recovered to their normal states within 3 months using all indicators. The results implied that the NDVI lacks sensitivity to changes in water stress in humid regions, and revealed that vegetation in humid regions may respond slowly and recover rapidly under droughts, which may relate to the water availability that enhances the resistance and resilience of the ecosystems.

摘要

气候变化引发了更频繁的干旱发生,这对生态系统功能造成了毁灭性的影响。关于干旱期间植被行为的研究主要集中在干旱/半干旱地区,但在湿润地区干旱期间的生态和植被响应仍不清楚。在这里,我们系统地评估了 2021 年发生在湿润的珠江流域的历史性干旱的演变,并使用多种植被指标量化了植被的响应。分析表明,东江流域和北江流域受干旱影响最为严重,干旱增强了地表温度和蒸散作用,导致土壤湿度和陆地水储量不足。基于太阳诱导荧光(SIF)的植被平均响应时间较短(2.7 个月),水利用效率(WUE)较短(2.8 个月),其次是总初级生产力(GPP)较短(3.2 个月),而归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和植被光学深度(VOD)较长(4.2 个月)。相比之下,使用所有指标,超过 90%的生态系统在 3 个月内恢复到正常状态。结果表明,NDVI 对湿润地区水分胁迫变化缺乏敏感性,并揭示了湿润地区的植被在干旱条件下可能反应缓慢但恢复迅速,这可能与增强生态系统抵抗力和恢复力的水分供应有关。

相似文献

1
Ecological and vegetation responses in a humid region in southern China during a historic drought.中国南方湿润地区历史干旱期的生态和植被响应。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:122986. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122986. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Dynamic process of ecosystem water use efficiency and response to drought in the Yellow River Basin, China.中国黄河流域生态系统水分利用效率的动态过程及其对干旱的响应
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 15;934:173339. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173339. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
Response of vegetation ecosystems to flash drought with solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence over the Hai River Basin, China during 2001-2019.2001 - 2019年中国海河流域植被生态系统对骤发干旱的太阳诱导叶绿素荧光响应
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jul 1;313:114947. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114947. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
The study of the response regularity of photosynthesis to flash drought in different vegetation ecosystems of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin.长江流域中下游不同植被生态系统光合作用对骤发干旱响应规律的研究
Int J Biometeorol. 2025 May;69(5):1057-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00484-025-02878-8. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
5
An evaluation framework for quantifying vegetation loss and recovery in response to meteorological drought based on SPEI and NDVI.基于标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)和归一化植被指数(NDVI)的气象干旱响应下植被损失与恢复量化评估框架
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 1;906:167632. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167632. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem water use efficiency and its response to soil moisture drought in a water-limited watershed of northern China.中国北方水资源匮乏流域生态系统水分利用效率的时空变化及其对土壤水分干旱的响应
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;355:120251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120251. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
7
The impact of drought on vegetation conditions within the Damqu River Basin, Yangtze River Source Region, China.干旱对中国长江源区当曲流域植被状况的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 24;13(8):e0202966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202966. eCollection 2018.
8
Assessing Vegetation Ecosystem Resistance to Drought in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River Basin, China.评估中国黄河中游地区植被生态系统对干旱的抵抗力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 31;19(7):4180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074180.
9
[Assessment of the lagging effect of vegetation response and loss probability in the Pearl River basin under drought stress].[干旱胁迫下珠江流域植被响应滞后效应及损失概率评估]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Apr 18;35(4):1083-1091. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202404.026.
10
Remote sensing of atmospheric and soil water stress on ecosystem carbon and water use during flash droughts over eastern China.中国东部旱灾后生态系统碳和水利用中大气和土壤水分胁迫的遥感研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Apr 10;868:161715. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161715. Epub 2023 Jan 20.