Suppr超能文献

基于旋转机架和固定束治疗肝肿瘤的碳离子治疗计划比较。

Treatment Planning Comparison of Gantry-based and Fixed Beams for the Treatment of Liver Tumors With Carbon Ion Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan;

Department of Heavy Particle Medical Science, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata, Japan.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2024 Nov-Dec;38(6):3002-3010. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13783.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare the use of a rotating gantry in liver tumor carbon-ion radiotherapy using of a fixed-port for treatment planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with liver tumors were analyzed. Three treatment plans were developed for each case: one with a rotating gantry with a 360° angle, one with fixed ports of 0° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting, and one with fixed ports of 45° and 90° with a ±20° couch rolling setting. The dose-volume histogram parameters of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) for each treatment plan were compared.

RESULTS

Significant differences in the volume of the liver-gross tumor volume (GTV) of normal liver irradiated with 5 Gy to 15 Gy were found between the gantry treatment plans and fixed-port treatment plans. There were no significant differences in the OARs, except for the CTV and liver GTV, between the gantry and fixed-port treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

The study results support the potential of using a rotating gantry to reduce liver doses, especially in the low-to-medium dose range, while maintaining target and OAR doses except for the liver. A rotating gantry could be especially useful in cases in which the relationship between the tumor and OAR is complicated by location.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在比较使用旋转机架和固定端口在肝脏肿瘤碳离子放射治疗中的应用,以制定治疗计划。

材料和方法

对 30 例肝脏肿瘤患者进行分析。为每个病例制定了三种治疗计划:一种是使用旋转机架,角度为 360°;一种是使用固定端口为 0°和 90°,并设置±20°的床面滚动;另一种是使用固定端口为 45°和 90°,并设置±20°的床面滚动。比较了每个治疗计划的临床靶区(CTV)和危及器官(OARs)的剂量体积直方图参数。

结果

在接受 5Gy 至 15Gy 剂量照射的肝脏-大体肿瘤体积(GTV)的肝脏体积方面,旋转机架治疗计划和固定端口治疗计划之间存在显著差异。除 CTV 和肝脏 GTV 外,OARs 之间无显著差异。

结论

研究结果支持使用旋转机架降低肝脏剂量的潜力,特别是在中低剂量范围内,同时保持靶区和 OAR 剂量,除肝脏外。对于因位置关系而导致肿瘤和 OAR 之间关系复杂的病例,旋转机架可能特别有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/294a/11535904/8522cd94acc9/in_vivo-38-3006-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验